Heick H M, Bégin-Heick N, Acharya C, Mohammed A
Clin Biochem. 1980 Apr;13(2):81-3. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(80)91243-6.
We have evaluated the use of Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) dye to measure the protein of urine and cerebral spinal fluid. The method was automated and compared with the turbidimetric method and with Ponceau S dye. With both the manual and automated procedures the CBB method could be used to protein concentrations of 160 mg/dl. Comparing this method to the method measuring the turbidity produced by trichloracetic acid (TCA) we found a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.96. The regression line was CBB = 0.84 TCA + 4.97. A similar comparison to the method using Ponceau S (PS) produced an r = 0.98 and the regression line, CBB = 0.91 P-S + 3.2. The CBB method was not as affected by turbidity in the samples or by xanthochromia as was the TCA Method. It is simpler to perform than the P-S method, since it does not require decantation. With the manual method, the coefficient of variation (CV) at 40 mg/dl for within-day determinations was less than 2% and, for between-day determinations, less than 4%. While the CV was somewhat higher with the ABA than with the manual method at 40 mg/dl, it was below 5% for both within-day and between-day determinations at the concentrations between 70 and 170 mg/dl. The method using CBB is useful as both a manual and automated procedure to measure protein in urine and cerebral spinal fluid.
我们评估了使用考马斯亮蓝(CBB)染料来测定尿液和脑脊液中的蛋白质。该方法实现了自动化,并与比浊法和丽春红S染料法进行了比较。无论是手动还是自动化操作,CBB法都可用于检测浓度高达160mg/dl的蛋白质。将该方法与测量三氯乙酸(TCA)产生的浊度的方法进行比较,我们发现相关系数(r)为0.96。回归线为CBB = 0.84TCA + 4.97。与使用丽春红S(PS)的方法进行类似比较,得到r = 0.98,回归线为CBB = 0.91P - S + 3.2。CBB法不像TCA法那样受样品浊度或黄变的影响。它比PS法操作更简单,因为它不需要倾析。采用手动方法时,日内测定在40mg/dl时的变异系数(CV)小于2%,日间测定小于4%。虽然在40mg/dl时,自动化方法的CV比手动方法略高,但在70至170mg/dl的浓度范围内,日内和日间测定的CV均低于5%。使用CBB的方法作为手动和自动化程序来测量尿液和脑脊液中的蛋白质都很有用。