Prior M R, Sanson A V
Med J Aust. 1980 Apr 19;1(8):375-6.
Numerical taxonomy was used in an attempt to identify subgroups in a sample of children labelled as hyperactive. In each of two analyses of Conners' questionnaire data (supplied by parents and by teachers), two classes were obtained, apparently differentiated on the basis of rated severity of behavioural symptoms. No aetiologically important differentiating attributes emerged. There was poor agreement between the two data sources. particularly in the classification of the more disordered group; and, over all, teachers perceived the children as less deviant than did parents. Comparison with earlier studies indicated the similarity in behavioural symptoms between this sample and those from other countries. However, the obtained data argued against the existence of a pure hyperactive disorder, since there was virtually no differentiation between conduct problems and items relating more specifically to hyperactivity. Hyperactivity as a diagnostic category appears to have little meaning either aetiologically, or descriptively, or prescriptively.
数值分类法被用于尝试在一组被标记为多动的儿童样本中识别亚组。在对康纳斯问卷数据的两项分析中(分别由家长和教师提供),均得到了两类,它们显然是根据行为症状的评定严重程度区分的。未出现具有病因学重要性的区分属性。两个数据源之间的一致性较差,尤其是在对症状更严重组的分类上;总体而言,教师认为这些孩子的偏差程度低于家长的认知。与早期研究的比较表明,该样本与其他国家样本在行为症状上具有相似性。然而,所得数据反驳了单纯多动障碍的存在,因为在品行问题和更具体与多动相关的项目之间几乎没有差异。多动作为一个诊断类别,在病因学、描述性或规范性方面似乎都没什么意义。