• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业人员和辅助专业人员的临床决策。

Clinical decision-making among professionals and paraprofessionals.

作者信息

Clavelle P R, Turner A D

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1980 Jul;36(3):833-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198007)36:3<833::aid-jclp2270360344>3.0.co;2-i.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(198007)36:3<833::aid-jclp2270360344>3.0.co;2-i
PMID:7410588
Abstract

Investigated the clinical decision-making process among three groups of mental health workers. Ss were 32 paraprofessionals, 11 social workers, and 13 clinical psychologists. Each S conducted two stimulated intake interviews and decided at certain times during the procedure whether the client was (a) in need of medication; (b) suicidal; and (c) in need of hospitalization. Results revealed that the professionals displayed no greater consensus in their decisions than did the paraprofessionals. The professionals, especially the psychologists, were more confident of their decisions, but only when it was appropriate (i.e., on questions on which they had reached some consensus). The psychologists were most consistent and focused in their manner of gathering information. The majority of Ss reached their decisions early in the interviews.

摘要

研究了三组心理健康工作者的临床决策过程。研究对象包括32名辅助专业人员、11名社会工作者和13名临床心理学家。每位研究对象进行了两次模拟接诊访谈,并在过程中的特定时间决定来访者是否(a)需要药物治疗;(b)有自杀倾向;以及(c)需要住院治疗。结果显示,专业人员在决策上并没有比辅助专业人员表现出更高的一致性。专业人员,尤其是心理学家,对自己的决策更有信心,但只有在合适的情况下(即对他们已达成某种共识的问题)才是如此。心理学家在收集信息的方式上最为一致且专注。大多数研究对象在访谈早期就做出了决定。

相似文献

1
Clinical decision-making among professionals and paraprofessionals.专业人员和辅助专业人员的临床决策。
J Clin Psychol. 1980 Jul;36(3):833-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198007)36:3<833::aid-jclp2270360344>3.0.co;2-i.
2
The training of paraprofessionals as behavior modifiers: a review.将辅助专业人员培训为行为矫正者:一项综述。
Am J Community Psychol. 1976 Jun;4(2):167-79. doi: 10.1007/BF00881939.
3
Personal characteristics and experiences of long-term allied health professionals in rural and northern British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省农村和北部地区长期从事专职医疗工作的专业人员的个人特征与经历。
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;9(4):1238. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
4
Decision making in psychiatric emergencies.精神科急诊中的决策制定
Health Soc Work. 1987 Fall;12(4):267-74. doi: 10.1093/hsw/12.4.267.
5
An explanation of turnover intention among early-career nursing and allied health professionals working in rural and remote Australia - findings from a grounded theory study.澳大利亚农村和偏远地区初入职场的护理及相关健康专业人员离职意向的解释——基于扎根理论研究的结果
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Sep;18(3):4511. doi: 10.22605/RRH4511. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
6
Multiple perspectives on shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare.精神卫生保健中的共享决策和跨专业合作的多重视角。
J Interprof Care. 2013 May;27(3):223-30. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.767225. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
7
Patient and contextual factors related to the decision to hospitalize patients from emergency psychiatric services.与急诊精神科服务中患者住院决策相关的患者及背景因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Dec;53(12):1586-91. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.12.1586.
8
Psychiatric decision making in the emergency room: a research overview.急诊室中的精神科决策:研究综述
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;145(8):918-25. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.8.918.
9
How are allied health notes used for inpatient care and clinical decision-making? A qualitative exploration of the views of doctors, nurses and allied health professionals.辅助医疗记录如何用于住院患者的护理和临床决策?对医生、护士和辅助医疗专业人员观点的定性探讨。
Health Inf Manag. 2017 Jan;46(1):23-31. doi: 10.1177/1833358316664451. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
The impact of 'statutory duties' on mental health social workers in the UK.“法定义务”对英国心理健康社会工作者的影响。
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Mar;13(2):145-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00540.x.