Dreger R M
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1980 Sep;8(3):297-322. doi: 10.1007/BF00916377.
An instrument has been developed through the Adolescent Behavioral Classification Project for assessing an adolescent's problems and for establishing a taxonomy of behaviors and of persons. Standardization has initially consisted of collecting from many sources 482 statements of problem behaviors and 30 "positive" behaviors, which can be observed by nonprofessional as well as professional persons; administering these behavior statements to 156 institutional and 94 noninstitutional mental health center adolescents and 376 of their parents; carrying out principal components analyses on the behavioral items and 3 demographic items, followed by Varimax and Promax rotations. Twenty-five factors scored on 410 items resulted from these procedures. Internal consistency coefficients for the factors range from .47 to .86. Test-retest reliabilities on a sample of 10 youths ranged from .24 to .94, with an average rtt of .71. Factor scores for different classes of respondents were fairly well correlated from one set to another. The different classes of respondents did not differ significantly from one another on "caution" items. Similarities are noted, by inspection, between these factors and those derived from the Children's Behavioral Classification Project and between those other authorities have set forth and the ABCP.
通过青少年行为分类项目开发了一种工具,用于评估青少年的问题,并建立行为和人员的分类法。标准化最初包括从多个来源收集482条问题行为陈述和30条“积极”行为陈述,这些行为非专业人员和专业人员均可观察到;将这些行为陈述应用于156名机构青少年、94名非机构心理健康中心青少年及其376名父母;对行为项目和3个人口统计学项目进行主成分分析,随后进行方差最大化和斜交旋转。这些程序产生了基于410个项目的25个因子得分。各因子的内部一致性系数在0.47至0.86之间。对10名青少年样本进行重测的信度在0.24至0.94之间,平均重测信度为0.71。不同类别的受访者的因子得分在不同组之间具有相当好的相关性。不同类别的受访者在“谨慎”项目上没有显著差异。通过检查发现,这些因子与儿童行为分类项目得出的因子之间、以及其他权威机构提出的因子与青少年行为分类项目之间存在相似之处。