Larsen T E, Little J H, Orell S R, Prade M
Pathology. 1980 Apr;12(2):245-53. doi: 10.3109/00313028009060079.
A congruence survey of pathologists in Brisbane, Adelaide, Oslo and Paris on classifying and grading histological features such as dermal invasion, cross-sectional profile, mitotic activity and lymphocytic infiltrate was done on 147 cutaneous melanomas. The overall agreement was about 70%, about one pathologist in three or four disagreeing on each feature. Taking into acount also the considerable number of slides in which agreement was less, the results are considered unsatisfactory. Agreement was highest in cross-sectional profile and least in level of invasion. It is evident that the gradings are subjective and indicate the need for detailed histological description in making the criteria and the necessity of collaboration between pathologists to study slides and clarify problems. Experience is important and the slides must be of high technical excellence. Comparisons of results between different pathologists on the histological quantitations of malignant melanoma should take note of the degree of congruence achievable.
对布里斯班、阿德莱德、奥斯陆和巴黎的病理学家就147例皮肤黑色素瘤的组织学特征(如真皮浸润、横截面轮廓、有丝分裂活性和淋巴细胞浸润)进行分类和分级开展了一项一致性调查。总体一致性约为70%,每四项特征中约有一名病理学家存在分歧。再考虑到大量一致性较低的切片,结果被认为不尽人意。横截面轮廓的一致性最高,浸润程度的一致性最低。显然,分级是主观的,这表明在制定标准时需要详细的组织学描述,并且病理学家之间有必要合作研究切片并澄清问题。经验很重要,并且切片必须具有高超的技术水平。不同病理学家在恶性黑色素瘤组织学定量结果的比较中应注意可实现的一致性程度。