Meyer-Probst B, Cammann G, Engel H, Heider B, Kleinpeter U, Teichmann H
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz). 1980 May;32(5):257-67.
The data given in the literature about frequency and relative importance of diagnostic criteria for children with cerebral lesions show considerable differences and so do, as a consequence, diagnosing practice and epidemiological statements. This study aims at weighting the determing factors of a diagnosis and ascretining their interrelations and the associated influence on the psychic-mental development. In a total of 279 six-year-old risk and control children eight criteria regarding brain damage were recorded. The conclusive results give evidence of the influence exerted by organic conditions on the child's development and of the possibility of objectification by common methods. There is no justifiable alternative to a primarily organic basis of the diagnosis of infantile brain damage.
文献中给出的关于脑损伤儿童诊断标准的频率和相对重要性的数据存在显著差异，因此诊断实践和流行病学陈述也存在差异。本研究旨在权衡诊断的决定因素，确定它们之间的相互关系以及对心理-精神发育的相关影响。总共对279名6岁的高危儿童和对照儿童记录了8条关于脑损伤的标准。确凿的结果证明了器质性状况对儿童发育的影响以及通过常规方法进行客观化的可能性。婴儿脑损伤的诊断以器质性病变为首要依据是无可替代的。
