Goto H, Adachi T, Utsunomiya T, Nakano H, Chin K
TIT J Life Sci. 1978;8(1-2):55-8.
Evoked response, P300 and CNV were investigated in the condition in which the subject was required to make a differential response to the acoustically and visually presented sentence with or without meaning, and he was able to determine whether the sentence had a meaning or not by understanding the key information. In healthy persons, P300 amplitude to the beginning of information and to the key information were larger than those to the others. P300 latency to the key character was longer. CNV appeared at the beginning of information and continued. The difference between CNVs produced by meaningful and meaningless sentences was observed after the key information. In aphasia, the difference between CNV's was not observed. In auditory agnosia, the difference between CNVs was not observed to acoustic sentences, but appeared to visual sentences. These results suggest that evoked response, P300 and CNV can be useful for assessing recognition of sentences.
在要求受试者对有意义或无意义的听觉和视觉呈现句子做出差异反应,并能够通过理解关键信息来判断句子是否有意义的条件下,对诱发反应、P300和关联性负变(CNV)进行了研究。在健康人中,对信息开始部分和关键信息的P300波幅大于对其他部分的波幅。对关键字符的P300潜伏期较长。CNV在信息开始时出现并持续。在关键信息之后观察到有意义和无意义句子产生的CNV之间的差异。在失语症患者中,未观察到CNV之间的差异。在听觉失认症患者中,对听觉句子未观察到CNV之间的差异,但对视觉句子则出现了差异。这些结果表明,诱发反应、P300和CNV可用于评估句子识别能力。