Suppr超能文献

多普勒超声检查与颈动脉分叉处动脉造影的比较。

Comparison of Doppler ultrasonography with arteriography of the carotid artery bifurcation.

作者信息

Weaver R G, Howard G, McKinney W M, Ball M R, Jones A M, Toole J F

出版信息

Stroke. 1980 Jul-Aug;11(4):402-4. doi: 10.1161/01.str.11.4.402.

Abstract

Continuous-wave (CW) Doppler ultrasound imaging for prediction of arteriogrphic abnormality at the carotid bifurcation was carried out in 195 arteries of 105 patients. The Doppler method had no predictive value when compared to angiographic findings in arteries classified as 0-50% stenosis by Doppler. In 50-75% stenosis by arteriography Doppler accuracy was 52%. With stenosis of 76-99% Doppler imaging correlated with 71% reliability. When an arteriogram was compared with Doppler imaging the latter gave a "false negative" reading in 56% and "false positive" readings in 19%. We conclude that Doppler ultrasound evaluation provides important information regarding the state of the carotid bifurcation, which supplements the bedside evaluation, but it does not substitute for arteriography.

摘要

对105例患者的195条动脉进行了连续波(CW)多普勒超声成像,以预测颈动脉分叉处的动脉造影异常。与多普勒分类为0 - 50%狭窄的动脉造影结果相比,多普勒方法没有预测价值。动脉造影显示50 - 75%狭窄时,多普勒准确性为52%。狭窄程度为76 - 99%时,多普勒成像的可靠性为71%。当将动脉造影与多普勒成像进行比较时,后者有56%的“假阴性”读数和19%的“假阳性”读数。我们得出结论,多普勒超声评估提供了有关颈动脉分叉状态的重要信息,它补充了床边评估,但不能替代动脉造影。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验