Chen W T, Ing T S, Daugirdas J T, Humayun H M, Brescia D J, Gandhi V C, Hano J E, Kheirbek A O
Artif Organs. 1980 Aug;4(3):187-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1980.tb03932.x.
Twelve patients underwent hemodialysis using dialysate containing 130 mEq/L sodium, and, on a separate occasion, dialysis using a dialysate of constantly decreasing sodium concentration (from 150 to 133 mEq/L). Hydrostatic ultra-filtration during dialysis was performed at a constant rate (900 ml/hr) during both treatments, and was continued until a substantial drop in mean arterial pressure (-15%) or symptoms were observed. A double-blind comparison of the two treatment modalities was thus achieved. At the end of ultrafiltration, significantly more fluid had been removed using decreasing sodium dialysate (2.9 +/- 0.3 kg) than when using the low-sodium dialysate (1.9 +/- 0.2 kg, P<0.001). Plasma sodium concentration at the end of ultrafiltration using decreasing sodium dialysate was not significantly different from the predialysis level. Hydrostatic ultrafiltration using a dialysate of decreasing sodium level may prove to be a useful means of removing excess fluid asymptomatically from dialysis patients.
12名患者使用含130 mEq/L钠的透析液进行血液透析,并且在另一个场合,使用钠浓度持续降低(从150降至133 mEq/L)的透析液进行透析。在两种治疗过程中,透析期间的静水压超滤均以恒定速率(900 ml/小时)进行,并持续至观察到平均动脉压大幅下降(-15%)或出现症状。由此实现了两种治疗方式的双盲比较。在超滤结束时,使用钠浓度降低的透析液去除的液体量(2.9±0.3 kg)明显多于使用低钠透析液时(1.9±0.2 kg,P<0.001)。使用钠浓度降低的透析液进行超滤结束时的血浆钠浓度与透析前水平无显著差异。使用钠水平降低的透析液进行静水压超滤可能被证明是一种从透析患者身上无症状地去除多余液体的有用方法。