Rodkey W G, Cabaud H E, McCarroll H R
J Hand Surg Am. 1980 Jul;5(4):366-71. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(80)80178-x.
Epineural neurorrhaphy under tension and interfascicular grafting, two methods of bridging gaps associated with loss of a nerve segment, were compared. After resection of a 2 cm length of both ulnar nerves in cats, one nerve was sutured under tension using an epineurial technique, and the other was repaired using multiple interfascicular sural nerve grafts. Six months later return of nerve function was evaluated. Subjective evaluation included ambulation, sensation, and intrinsic function. Objective measurements included muscle efficiency, maximum strength, muscle weights, and total axon counts. No statistical difference was observed between these two techniques. Histochemically, there was marked fiber type grouping of the reinnervated muscles for both types of repairs. Histologically, perineurial fibrosis and axonal disorganization were equal for both techniques, but significantly greater suture granuloma formation occurred in the nerve repaired under tension. Individual grafts retained their identity and remained distinct grossly and microscopically.
对张力下的神经外膜缝合术和束间移植术这两种用于桥接与神经节段缺失相关间隙的方法进行了比较。在切除猫双侧尺神经2厘米长度后,一条神经采用神经外膜技术在张力下缝合,另一条神经则使用多条腓肠神经束间移植进行修复。六个月后评估神经功能恢复情况。主观评估包括行走、感觉和固有功能。客观测量包括肌肉效率、最大力量、肌肉重量和总轴突计数。这两种技术之间未观察到统计学差异。组织化学方面,两种修复类型的再支配肌肉均有明显的纤维类型分组。组织学上,两种技术的神经束膜纤维化和轴突紊乱程度相同,但张力下缝合修复的神经中缝合肉芽肿形成明显更多。单个移植物保持其特征,在大体和显微镜下均保持清晰可辨。