Fagius J, Wallin B G
J Neurol Sci. 1980 Sep;47(3):433-48. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(80)90098-2.
(1) Micro-electrode recordings were made of multi-unit sympathetic activity in skin or muscle branches of the median nerve at the elbow and the peroneal nerve at the fibular head in 69 healthy subjects. In some recordings changes in skin resistance and pulse plethysmograms were monitored within the receptive field of the impaled fascicles. Conduction velocities in postganglionic sympathetic fibres were measured either directly in double nerve recordings (9 subjects) or indirectly by determining the latency of either of two sympathetic reflexes. For skin nerve sympathetic activity (SSA) the excitatory reflex response to an electrical skin stimulus was used and for muscle nerve sympathetic activity (MSA) the inhibitory baroreflex response to single arterial pulse waves. (2) For MSA, reflex latencies were 0.90--1.13 s in median and 1.22--1.54 s in peroneal nerve recordings. Corresponding latencies for SSA were 0.48--0.66 s and 0.72--0.91 s, respectively. Reflex latency showed a positive correlation with body height and with length of the extremity recorded from. From the correlation with extremity length, average conduction velocities for MSA in median and peroneal nerves were calculated to be 0.74 and 1.11 m/s, respectively. Corresponding figures for SSA were 1.69 and 1.16 m/s. (3) With direct determinations of conduction velocities average values for MSA (comprising mainly vasoconstrictor fibres) in median and peroneal nerves were 0.72 and 1.09 m/s, respectively. With direct SSA determinations, sympathetic bursts containing only vasoconstrictor impulses (giving plethysmographic responses but no changes of skin resistance) had lower conduction velocities than bursts containing only sudomotor impulses (giving electrodermal but no plethysmographic responses) or a mixture of sudomotor and vasoconstrictor impulses. Average values (0.77 and 1.27 m/s, respectively) were similar in median and peroneal recordings. (4) It is concluded that determination of reflex latency is a useful indirect measure of conduction velocity in sympathetic postganglionic fibres.
(1)对69名健康受试者的肘部正中神经皮肤或肌肉分支以及腓骨头处的腓总神经进行了多单位交感神经活动的微电极记录。在一些记录中,在刺入束的感受野内监测皮肤电阻和脉搏体积描记图的变化。节后交感神经纤维的传导速度通过双神经记录直接测量(9名受试者),或通过确定两种交感反射中任一种的潜伏期间接测量。对于皮肤神经交感神经活动(SSA),使用对皮肤电刺激的兴奋性反射反应;对于肌肉神经交感神经活动(MSA),使用对单个动脉脉搏波的抑制性压力反射反应。(2)对于MSA,正中神经记录中的反射潜伏期为0.90 - 1.13秒,腓总神经记录中的反射潜伏期为1.22 - 1.54秒。SSA的相应潜伏期分别为0.48 - 0.66秒和0.72 - 0.91秒。反射潜伏期与身高以及记录部位的肢体长度呈正相关。根据与肢体长度的相关性,计算出正中神经和腓总神经中MSA的平均传导速度分别为0.74米/秒和1.11米/秒。SSA的相应数值为1.69米/秒和1.16米/秒。(3)通过直接测定传导速度,正中神经和腓总神经中MSA(主要包括血管收缩纤维)的平均值分别为0.72米/秒和1.09米/秒。在直接测定SSA时,仅包含血管收缩冲动(产生体积描记反应但无皮肤电阻变化)的交感神经爆发的传导速度低于仅包含发汗运动冲动(产生皮肤电反应但无体积描记反应)或发汗运动和血管收缩冲动混合的爆发。正中神经和腓总神经记录中的平均值(分别为0.77米/秒和1.27米/秒)相似。(4)得出的结论是,反射潜伏期的测定是交感节后纤维传导速度的一种有用的间接测量方法。