• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一场灾难的尸检:马丁内斯巴士事故

Autopsy of a disaster: the Martinez bus accident.

作者信息

Lewis F R, Trunkey D D, Steele M R

出版信息

J Trauma. 1980 Oct;20(10):861-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198010000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-198010000-00007
PMID:7420496
Abstract

On 21 May 1975 a chartered bus carrying 51 members of a student choir rolled from a sharply curved freeway off-ramp and fell 22 feet, landing on its roof, which collapsed. Twenty-nine passengers died (25 before extrication) and 22, plus the driver, survived. An analysis of factors leading up to the accident reveals several contributing causes, among them inadequate design of the ramp, poor warning signs, driver inexperience with the bus, and deficient bus maintenance. Bus design itself contributed to the lethality of the event. Structural support for the roof was inadequate and no access was available to the interior for extrication of victims. Problems with organization at the scene, triage, and communications among agencies involved in the rescue and receiving hospitals contributed to confusion in the transport of victims, although it appears this had little impact on outcome. An analysis of the accident allows several lessons to be learned which might prevent, or reduce, the fatalities from future accidents involving multipassenger vehicles, and other disasters with 10 to 25, or more than 25 fatalities. In the present report ten of 25 killed were judged possibly salvageable with immediate extrication.

摘要

1975年5月21日,一辆载有51名学生合唱团成员的包车从一段弯道很急的高速公路出口匝道冲出,坠下22英尺,车顶着地并坍塌。29名乘客死亡(25人在救出前死亡),22名乘客以及司机幸存。对事故成因的分析揭示了几个促成因素,其中包括匝道设计不当、警示标志不佳、司机对巴士不熟悉以及巴士维护不足。巴士设计本身也增加了事故的致命性。车顶的结构支撑不足,车内没有通道可供救援人员解救受害者。事故现场的组织、伤员分类以及参与救援的机构和接收医院之间的沟通存在问题,导致受害者转运过程中出现混乱,不过这似乎对结果影响不大。对该事故的分析可以吸取一些教训,这些教训可能有助于预防或减少未来涉及多乘客车辆事故以及造成10至25人或超过25人死亡的其他灾难的死亡人数。在本报告中,25名遇难者中有10人被判定如果能立即救出有可能获救。

相似文献

1
Autopsy of a disaster: the Martinez bus accident.一场灾难的尸检:马丁内斯巴士事故
J Trauma. 1980 Oct;20(10):861-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198010000-00007.
2
Assessment of the disaster medical response system through an investigation of a 43-vehicle mass collision on Jung-ang expressway.通过对京江高速公路 43 车连环相撞事故的调查评估灾害医疗应急系统
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Feb;123:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
3
MCI challenge. Crash on the 710 Freeway: 41 patients transported in 1 hour 41 minutes at one of the nation's largest multi-casualty traffic accidents.轻度认知障碍挑战。710高速公路车祸:在这场美国最大的多伤亡交通事故之一中,41名患者在1小时41分钟内被运送。
JEMS. 2003 Apr;28(4):30-8.
4
Get off the bus: sound strategy for injury prevention during a tornado?下车:龙卷风期间预防受伤的合理策略?
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):189-92. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00002430.
5
Increasing evacuation flow through school bus emergency roof hatches.增加校车紧急屋顶出口的疏散流量。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103178. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103178. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
6
Mobile triage team in a community disaster plan.社区灾难预案中的移动分诊小组。
JACEP. 1977 Jan;6(1):10-2. doi: 10.1016/s0361-1124(77)80278-5.
7
Methods for identification of 28 burn victims following a 1996 bus accident in Spain.1996年西班牙一起公交车事故后28名烧伤受害者的身份识别方法。
J Forensic Sci. 1999 Mar;44(2):428-31.
8
Medical investigation after a motorcoach strikes the rear of a tractor semitrailer parked on the highway; 13 fatal.一辆长途客车撞上停在高速公路上的一辆半挂牵引车尾部后的医学调查;13人死亡。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S162-S164. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1532215.
9
Characteristics and triage of a maritime disaster: an accidental passenger ship collision in Korea.特点和分诊的海上灾难:一起意外的客轮碰撞事故在韩国。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(3):177-80. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328330f452.
10
Hospital emergency preparedness - lessons learned since Northridge.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1307-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp030022.

引用本文的文献

1
Delphi study into planning for care of children in major incidents.关于重大事件中儿童护理规划的德尔菲研究。
Arch Dis Child. 1999 May;80(5):406-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.5.406.
2
Impact of urban disaster on a university trauma center.城市灾害对大学创伤中心的影响。
West J Med. 1988 Feb;148(2):225-7.