Harries M G, Burge P S, O'Brien I M
Br J Ind Med. 1980 Aug;37(3):248-52. doi: 10.1136/oem.37.3.248.
Thirty-seven patients with asthma or alveolitis thought to result from exposure to materials commonly encountered at their work were tested by inhalation of an aerosol of these materials. Twenty-four (65%) developed an immediate asthmatic reaction, which was followed by a non-immediate reaction in 10, of whom six developed the signs and symptoms of alveolitis. Eighteen (76%) patients with asthmatic reactions to test material were prick test positive to that material while only two our of 13 with a negative inhalation test were prick test positive (15%). Precipitating antibody to test material was measured in 23 and was present in nine (39%) of those with positive inhalation tests, and one (12%) of those with negative tests. It was present in five of the six with a reaction in the gas exchanging portions of the lung.
37名被认为因工作中常接触的物质而引发哮喘或肺泡炎的患者,通过吸入这些物质的气雾剂进行了测试。24名(65%)患者出现了速发型哮喘反应,其中10名随后出现了迟发型反应,这10名中有6名出现了肺泡炎的体征和症状。对测试物质有哮喘反应的18名(76%)患者对该物质点刺试验呈阳性,而吸入试验阴性的13名患者中只有2名(15%)点刺试验呈阳性。对23名患者检测了针对测试物质的沉淀抗体,吸入试验阳性的患者中有9名(39%)呈阳性,吸入试验阴性的患者中有1名(12%)呈阳性。在肺部气体交换部位出现反应的6名患者中有5名呈阳性。