Catford J C
Br Med J. 1980 Jun 14;280(6229):1435-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6229.1435.
In a feasibility study of how often doctors prescribe drugs inappropriately for children 6331 FP10 forms issued to children in September 1978 by a random sample of 72 general practitioners in Wessex were examined. Prescriptions for drugs long known to be contraindicated in children--for instance, chloramphenicol, barbiturates, tetracyclines, and those with effects on appetite--were not encountered. Most scripts were for one drug only. Only about 1% (80/6331) of prescriptions could legitimately be called into question on the basis of current modern specialist teaching, although 42% of the doctors used drugs that have recently been considered to be hazardous or undesirable. These were predominantly drugs to control the symptoms of diarrhoea, vomiting, and enuresis. It is concluded that aspects of prescribing for children are responsible in the main but that there is a lag in the availability or use of important information relevant to general practice. The approach used in this study is applicable to many other areas of clinical practice and does not threaten individual doctors. It may prove to be a convenient way of assessing the general quality of medical care for children.
在一项关于医生给儿童不当开药频率的可行性研究中,对1978年9月由韦塞克斯郡72名全科医生随机抽取的样本发给儿童的6331份FP10表格进行了检查。未发现长期以来已知对儿童禁用的药物的处方,如氯霉素、巴比妥类药物、四环素以及那些影响食欲的药物。大多数处方仅开一种药。根据当前现代专科教学,只有约1%(80/6331)的处方可被合理质疑,尽管42%的医生使用了最近被认为有危险或不理想的药物。这些主要是用于控制腹泻、呕吐和遗尿症状的药物。得出的结论是,儿童用药的某些方面是主要原因,但与全科医疗相关的重要信息的可得性或使用存在滞后。本研究中使用的方法适用于临床实践的许多其他领域,且不会对个别医生构成威胁。它可能被证明是评估儿童医疗总体质量的一种便捷方式。