Contraception. 1980 May;21(5):445-59. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(80)90010-4.
The results are reported of a randomized, double-blind study of two daily oral contraceptives, both containing 3mg norethisterone acetate; one also contained 50 microgram ethinyl estradiol, while the other contained a mixture of micronized 4mg estradiol plus 2mg estriol. The trial was conducted to a common protocol at WHO Collaborating Centres for Clinical Research (CCCR's) in Bangkok, Bombay, Singapore and Szeged. Of the 925 women who entered the study, 458 received the product containing "natural" estrogens and 467 received the product containing ethinyl estradiol. Analysis of admission characteristics showed that the two groups were very closely matched. There was no statistically significant difference in contraceptive efficacy between the two products; both have annual failure rates of approximately 1 per 100 women. The discontinuation rate after one year was 51.5 for the "natural" estrogen product and 48.4 for the one containing synthetic estrogen. Discontinuation for menstrual irregularities was significantly higher for the "natural" estrogen preparation. During both the first three treatment cycles and the tenth to twelfth cycles, the incidence of various menstrual irregularities was significantly higher in the "natural" estrogen contraceptive. Adverse clinical associations were those commonly reported with other combined oral contraceptives for both preparations. It is concluded that the high incidence of menstrual irregularities associated with the particular combination of norethisterone acetate and "natural" estrogens renders it less suitable for general use in family planning programmes than combinations containing synthetic estrogens, such as ethinyl estradiol.
本文报告了一项关于两种每日口服避孕药的随机双盲研究结果,这两种避孕药均含有3mg醋酸炔诺酮;一种还含有50μg炔雌醇,另一种含有4mg微粉化雌二醇与2mg雌三醇的混合物。该试验按照共同方案在曼谷、孟买、新加坡和塞格德的世界卫生组织临床研究合作中心(CCCR's)进行。在925名进入研究的女性中,458名接受了含“天然”雌激素的产品,467名接受了含炔雌醇的产品。对入选特征的分析表明,两组非常匹配。两种产品的避孕效果无统计学显著差异;两者的年失败率均约为每100名女性中有1例失败。含“天然”雌激素产品的一年停药率为51.5%,含合成雌激素产品的停药率为48.4%。“天然”雌激素制剂因月经不规律而停药的比例显著更高。在头三个治疗周期以及第十至第十二个周期中,“天然”雌激素避孕药出现各种月经不规律情况的发生率均显著更高。两种制剂出现的不良临床情况均为其他复方口服避孕药常见的情况。结论是,与醋酸炔诺酮和“天然”雌激素的特定组合相关的月经不规律发生率较高,这使得它比含合成雌激素(如炔雌醇)的组合更不适用于计划生育项目的常规使用。