Suppr超能文献

测定葡萄酒中二氧化硫的开膛法:协同研究

Ripper procedure for determining sulfur dioxide in wine: collaborative study.

作者信息

Vahl J M, Converse J E

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1980 Mar;63(2):194-9.

PMID:7430025
Abstract

Twenty-three laboratories analyzed 5 replicate wine samples according to a specified version of the Ripper direct iodometric titration for sulfur dioxide. Each sample was analyzed for (A) free SO2, (B) total SO2, and (C) iodine-reactive substances other than SO2. Although variation of A with temperature and of A and B with time of analysis were anticipated, analysis of covariance showed no significant reduction in error when these variables were taken into account. Error did vary with SO2 level and wine type, red vs white. Pooled estimates of precision (within-laboratory error) in mg SO2/L wine were, for white wine: (A) 3.3, (B) 10.4, (C) 1.9; for red wine: (A) 3.8, (B) 7.3, (C) 1.9. Pooled estimates of systematic (between-laboratory) error in mgSO2/L wine were, for white wine: (A) 2.7, (B) 16.6, (C) 2.1; for red wine: (A) 4.3, (B) 15.1, (C) 3.0. Although rapid and convenient, the Ripper method is severely limited by poor precision and large systematic error. The Ripper method is not recommended for adoption by the AOAC.

摘要

23个实验室根据二氧化硫的Ripper直接碘量滴定法的特定版本,对5个重复的葡萄酒样品进行了分析。每个样品都分析了(A)游离SO2、(B)总SO2和(C)除SO2之外的碘反应性物质。尽管预计A会随温度变化,A和B会随分析时间变化,但协方差分析表明,考虑这些变量后误差并未显著降低。误差确实随SO2水平和葡萄酒类型(红葡萄酒与白葡萄酒)而变化。白葡萄酒中SO2/L葡萄酒的精密度(实验室内误差)合并估计值为:(A) 3.3、(B) 10.4、(C) 1.9;红葡萄酒为:(A) 3.8、(B) 7.3、(C) 1.9。白葡萄酒中SO2/L葡萄酒的系统误差(实验室间误差)合并估计值为:(A) 2.7、(B) 16.6、(C) 2.1;红葡萄酒为:(A) 4.3、(B) 15.1、(C) 3.0。尽管Ripper方法快速便捷,但精密度差和系统误差大严重限制了它。不建议AOAC采用Ripper方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验