Horan M J, Steinwachs D M, Smith C R, Shapiro S
J Community Health. 1980 Fall;6(1):6-17. doi: 10.1007/BF01324053.
In 1975, the Johns Hopkins Medical house staff was reorganized into four Firms. Each Firm provides inpatient and outpatient care to a group of patients. Two of the goals of the reorganization were to improve accessibility and continuity of care. This study, based on a before and after research design utilizing routinely collected data, sought to determine whether these goals had been attained. Accessibility was assessed by observing changes in waiting time for appointments, broken appointments, and number of patients seen before their scheduled appointments. The results showed that mean waiting time for a Medical Clinic appointment fell from 15 days to 1 day (p < 0.01); broken appointments for new patients fell from 54% to 34% (p < 0.01); no significant changes occurred in broken appointments for old clinic patients (34% vs 32%); and patients seen before their scheduled appointments increased from 30% to 38% (p < 0.001). Continuity was assessed by observing changes in use of emergency and walk-in clinic services, the proportion of Medical Clinic patients lost to follow-up care, the proportion of hospital readmissions returning to the same nursing unit, and the proportion of patients discharged from the hospital who returned to the Medical Clinic. The results showed that use of emergency and walk-in clinic services fell slightly, from 24% of all visits before to 22% of all visits after the Firm System (p < 0.001); no change occurred in the proportion of patients lost to Medical Clinic follow-up (21% before and after the Firm System); the proportion of hospital readmissions returning to the same nursing unit increased from 35% to 73% (p < 0.005); and the proportion of patients discharged from the hospital who returned to the Medical Clinic increased from 21% to 35% (p < 0.001). These data suggest that implementing the Firm System led to improvement in several selected aspects of accessibility and continuity of care but that further improvements could be made.
1975年,约翰霍普金斯医院的住院医师被重新组织为四个医疗小组。每个医疗小组为一组患者提供住院和门诊护理。重组的两个目标是提高医疗服务的可及性和连续性。本研究基于前后对照的研究设计,利用常规收集的数据,旨在确定这些目标是否已经实现。通过观察预约等待时间、爽约情况以及提前就诊患者数量的变化来评估可及性。结果显示,内科门诊预约的平均等待时间从15天降至1天(p < 0.01);新患者的爽约率从54%降至34%(p < 0.01);老门诊患者的爽约率无显著变化(34%对32%);提前就诊的患者从30%增至38%(p < 0.001)。通过观察急诊和即时诊所服务的使用变化、内科门诊失访患者的比例、再次住院回到同一护理单元的比例以及出院后回到内科门诊的患者比例来评估连续性。结果显示,急诊和即时诊所服务的使用略有下降,从之前所有就诊的24%降至医疗小组系统实施后的所有就诊的22%(p < 0.001);内科门诊失访患者的比例没有变化(医疗小组系统前后均为21%);再次住院回到同一护理单元的比例从35%增至73%(p < 0.005);出院后回到内科门诊的患者比例从21%增至35%(p < 0.001)。这些数据表明,实施医疗小组系统在医疗服务的可及性和连续性的几个选定方面带来了改善,但仍有进一步提升的空间。