Gilmer P R, Williams L J
Am J Clin Pathol. 1980 Oct;74(4 Suppl):600-5.
Three years ago, the authors described methods for calibration and quality control of Coulter automated hematology instruments. These and other methods have received fairly widespread use in hematology laboratories. The effectiveness of such use was tested through special questionnaires conducted by the College of American Pathologists in 1978. Current information indicates no clear-cut advantages between fresh whole blood and preserved-cell control materials when properly used for calibration or quality control procedures. Minor but troublesome differences persistently appear between manual or semiautomated methods and in results on fully automated systems. Likewise, daily internal quality control may be monitored by preserved cells or by continuous process control using patient samples. The various systems for calibration and quality control have certain advantages and disadvantages.
三年前，作者描述了库尔特自动血液学仪器的校准和质量控制方法。这些方法以及其他方法在血液学实验室中得到了相当广泛的应用。1978年，美国病理学家学会通过特别问卷对这种应用的有效性进行了测试。目前的信息表明，在正确用于校准或质量控制程序时，新鲜全血和保存细胞对照材料之间没有明显的优势。手动或半自动方法与全自动系统的结果之间始终存在微小但麻烦的差异。同样，日常内部质量控制可以通过保存细胞或使用患者样本的连续过程控制来监测。各种校准和质量控制系统都有一定的优缺点。
