Milner J S, Wimberley R C
J Clin Psychol. 1980 Oct;36(4):875-84. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198010)36:4<875::aid-jclp2270360407>3.0.co;2-1.
Administered the Child Abuse Potential Inventory to 65 abusing and 65 matched nonabusing parents. An item analysis indicated that 77 of the 160 Inventory items significantly discriminated between abusers and nonabusers. A discriminant analysis, which employed the 77 significant items, correctly classified 125, or 96% of the 130 Ss as abusers or nonabusers. Identical results were obtained from a stepwise multiple regression analysis. Principal axis factoring with oblique promax rotations yielded a seven-factor solution with relatively specific dimensions. The seven factors, or dimensions, were: Distress, rigidity, child with problems, problems from family and others, unhappiness, loneliness, and negative concept of child and of self. Further analysis revealed that the rigidity, unhappiness, and distress factors were the most meaningful dimensions in the understanding of why some people abuse children.
对65名虐待儿童的父母和65名配对的非虐待儿童的父母进行了儿童虐待潜在性量表测试。项目分析表明,该量表160个项目中的77个在虐待者和非虐待者之间有显著差异。使用这77个显著项目进行的判别分析,正确地将130名受试者中的125名(即96%)归类为虐待者或非虐待者。逐步多元回归分析也得到了相同的结果。采用斜交普罗麦克斯旋转的主轴因子分析得出了一个具有相对特定维度的七因子解决方案。这七个因子或维度分别是:苦恼、僵化、孩子有问题、来自家庭和他人的问题、不快乐、孤独以及对孩子和自我的负面观念。进一步分析表明,僵化、不快乐和苦恼因子在理解为什么有些人虐待儿童方面是最有意义的维度。