• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自主性抑郁的特征。

Characteristics of autonomous depression.

作者信息

Nelson J C, Charney D S, Quinlan D M

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980 Nov;168(11):637-43. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198011000-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-198011000-00001
PMID:7441225
Abstract

The records of 172 depressed inpatients were examined retrospectively to determine the presenting symptoms, history of stress, clinical course, and personality features characteristic of patients whose depressive syndrome had become autonomous. The autonomous distinction was based on observation of a lack of responsiveness of the syndrome to environmental events during the first week of hospitalization prior to drug treatment. The autonomous criterion was selected since it is a central characteristic of recent psychobiological models of depression and it could be operationally defined, reliably rated, and assessed independently of other patient characteristics. Sixty-eight autonomous patients were identified and compared with 104 patients who were responsive to hospitalization. The characteristics of the autonomous patients are discussed in relation to the previous literature, other diagnostic systems, and the criteria proposed for the diagnosis of melancholia in DSM-III.

摘要

对172例抑郁症住院患者的记录进行了回顾性检查,以确定那些抑郁综合征已发展为自主性的患者的初始症状、应激史、临床病程及人格特征。自主性的区分基于在药物治疗前住院第一周期间对该综合征对环境事件缺乏反应性的观察。选择自主性标准是因为它是近期抑郁症心理生物学模型的核心特征,并且可以进行操作性定义、可靠评分,且独立于其他患者特征进行评估。识别出68例自主性患者,并与104例对住院治疗有反应的患者进行比较。结合既往文献、其他诊断系统以及DSM-III中提出的忧郁症诊断标准,对自主性患者的特征进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of autonomous depression.自主性抑郁的特征。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980 Nov;168(11):637-43. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198011000-00001.
2
Primary affective disorder criteria and the endogenous-reactive distinction.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980 Jul;37(7):787-93. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780200065007.
3
Descriptive validity of DSM-III depressions.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986 Oct;174(10):573-84. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198610000-00001.
4
Assessment of depression by questionnaire compared to DSM-III diagnosis.通过问卷调查评估抑郁症与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)诊断结果的比较。
J Affect Disord. 1985 Mar-Apr;8(2):167-70. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(85)90040-0.
5
Validity of adjustment disorder, comparison with major depression.
J Affect Disord. 1989 Nov-Dec;17(3):229-36. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(89)90004-9.
6
[Dysthymic disorders. Clinical aspects, nosology and epidemiology].[恶劣心境障碍。临床方面、疾病分类学及流行病学]
Encephale. 1992 Dec;18 Spec No 5:707-15.
7
The clinical features of bipolar depression: a comparison with matched major depressive disorder patients.双相抑郁的临床特征:与匹配的重度抑郁障碍患者的比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;62(3):212-6; quiz 217.
8
[Percentile distribution of depression scales of the AMDP system].[AMDP系统抑郁量表的百分位数分布]
Nervenarzt. 1990 Mar;61(3):183-5.
9
The validity of neurotic-reactive depression. New data and reappraisal.神经症性反应性抑郁症的效度:新数据与重新评估
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Nov;42(11):1116-22. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790340100014.
10
Psychological factors in the development of mood disorders with a seasonal pattern.
Psychopathology. 1996 Nov-Dec;29(6):331-9. doi: 10.1159/000285015.