Young R F, Post E M, King G A
J Neurosurg. 1980 Dec;53(6):741-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.1980.53.6.0741.
Metastases to the spinal epidural space with compression of the spinal cord or cauda equina are commonly encountered by physicians in a variety of clinical field. In the recent past, decompressive laminectomy followed by radiotheray was thought to be the best available treatment. More recently, radiotherapy alone has been advocated as an alternative treatment mode with a similar rate of effectiveness. This study compares laminectomy followed by radiotherapy to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of spinal epidural metastases in a randomized, prospective clinical trial. No significant difference was found in the effectiveness of the two treatment methods in regard to pain relief, improved ambulation, or improved sphincter function. Patients with an incomplete myelographic block fared well regardless of treatment, and those with a complete block fared poorly. Because of the limited size of this study and because of certain unforeseen design defects, the results are suggestive but not conclusive. Suggestions are made for a future randomized, prospective multicenter study that would conclusively answer the perplexing question as to the most efficacious method for treating spinal epidural metastases.
脊髓硬膜外间隙转移瘤伴脊髓或马尾受压在多个临床领域的医生中较为常见。过去,减压性椎板切除术联合放疗被认为是最佳治疗方法。最近,单纯放疗被提倡作为一种疗效相似的替代治疗模式。本研究在一项随机、前瞻性临床试验中,比较了减压性椎板切除术联合放疗与单纯放疗治疗脊髓硬膜外转移瘤的效果。两种治疗方法在缓解疼痛、改善行走能力或改善括约肌功能方面的有效性没有显著差异。脊髓造影显示不完全梗阻的患者无论接受何种治疗,预后良好;而完全梗阻的患者预后较差。由于本研究规模有限且存在某些不可预见的设计缺陷,结果具有提示性但不具有决定性。针对未来的随机、前瞻性多中心研究提出了建议,该研究将最终回答关于治疗脊髓硬膜外转移瘤最有效方法这一令人困惑的问题。