• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与助听器选择相关的言语频段偏好聆听水平。

Preferred listening levels for bands of speech in relation to hearing aid selection.

作者信息

Christen R, Byrne D

出版信息

Scand Audiol. 1980;9(1):3-10. doi: 10.3109/01050398009076328.

DOI:10.3109/01050398009076328
PMID:7444317
Abstract

The Most Comfortable Loudness Level (MCL) was measured for 24 normal-hearing subjects, using narrow bands of speech having centre frequencies of 0.25, 0.5, 1.2 and 4kHz. MCL's were equivalent for octave band and one-third octave band stimuli. The sensation levels (SL) for various frequencies closely matched the SL of the 60 phon equal loudness contour for pure tones. It was concluded, for levels around MCL, sounds which are equally comfortable are equally loud and that equal loudness contours for pure tones are also applicable to narrow bands of speech. Some implications for hearing aid selection are discussed. However, this investigation was primarily a preliminary to other studies more directly related to hearing aid selection issues.

摘要

使用中心频率为0.25、0.5、1.2和4kHz的窄带语音,对24名听力正常的受试者测量了最舒适响度水平(MCL)。对于倍频程带和1/3倍频程带刺激,MCL是等效的。不同频率的感觉水平(SL)与纯音60方等响度轮廓的SL紧密匹配。得出结论,对于接近MCL的水平,同样舒适的声音响度相同,并且纯音的等响度轮廓也适用于窄带语音。讨论了对助听器选择的一些影响。然而,这项研究主要是其他与助听器选择问题更直接相关研究的初步探索。

相似文献

1
Preferred listening levels for bands of speech in relation to hearing aid selection.与助听器选择相关的言语频段偏好聆听水平。
Scand Audiol. 1980;9(1):3-10. doi: 10.3109/01050398009076328.
2
Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Aug;80(2):484-93. doi: 10.1121/1.394044.
3
Magnitude estimation of loudness. I: Application to hearing aid selection.响度的量级估计。I:在助听器选择中的应用。
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Mar;27(1):20-7. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2701.20.
4
Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.正常听力和听力受损受试者中相等响度窄带信号的响度总和
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S71-S80. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1380848. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
5
The effect of test signal type and bandwidth on the categorical scaling of loudness.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Apr;99(4 Pt 1):2281-7. doi: 10.1121/1.415415.
6
Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.舒适响度水平:刺激效果、长期可靠性及可预测性。
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Dec;32(4):816-28.
7
Prediction of aided preferred listening levels for hearing aid gain prescription.助听器增益处方中辅助偏好聆听水平的预测。
Ear Hear. 1982 Mar-Apr;3(2):66-71. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198203000-00003.
8
Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids.用于助听器验配的响度模型。I. 线性助听器。
Br J Audiol. 1998 Oct;32(5):317-35. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000083.
9
Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids.线性和慢作用压缩式助听器的首选聆听水平。
Ear Hear. 1995 Aug;16(4):407-16. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199508000-00007.
10
Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?初次使用助听器的用户更喜欢正常音量还是低于正常的整体音量?
Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):159-72. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000120364.13671.e2.