Homsy Y, Simard J, Debs C, Laberge I, Perreault G
Urology. 1980 Dec;16(6):577-83. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(80)90562-2.
The use of diversion in conjunction with pyeloplasty has been a matter of continuous debate for a number of years. In consequence the matter has been left to the urologist's individual preferences with no objective data to support these preferences. Herein the authors present an analysis of 105 pyeloplasties performed by four surgeons over a period of eighteen years with a view to determine the place and type of diversion in relation to the surgical technique used and the long-term effects of such diversion or abstinence thereof.
多年来，肾盂成形术联合尿路改道的应用一直存在持续的争论。因此，此事一直交由泌尿外科医生个人偏好决定，并无客观数据支持这些偏好。在此，作者对四位外科医生在18年期间进行的105例肾盂成形术进行了分析，旨在确定尿路改道的位置和类型与所采用的手术技术的关系，以及这种尿路改道或不进行尿路改道的长期影响。
