Stock D, Diezemann E D, Gottstein J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1980;97(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/BF00381521.
The first clinical results of the Lindenhof ceramic-metal composite prosthesis implanted in our hospital in Freiburg are presented. We observed that same favorable early results as the conventional prostheses in a correct position. The implants are incorporated into the bone within 8-12 weeks. The radiographic films show the adaptation of the supporting bone around the ceramic socket. We explain the failures due to our initial lack of technical experience and/or anatomical deformation of the pelvic bone. complications caused by the post-operative treatment during the 12 weeks following surgery did not occur. The combination of a cemented metal femoral component with a ceramic head seems to be a reasonable compromise to use the favorable physical and biochemical properties of the bioceramic material as long as there is no satisfactory solution for a stable cementless fixation of the femoral stem in to the bone. The advantages of the Lindenhof prosthesis predominate the disadvantages: expensive instruments and a post-operative treatment of several months.
本文展示了在弗莱堡我们医院植入的林登霍夫陶瓷-金属复合假体的首批临床结果。我们观察到,在位置正确的情况下,其早期结果与传统假体一样良好。植入物在8至12周内与骨结合。X光片显示了陶瓷臼周围支撑骨的适应性。我们将失败原因解释为最初缺乏技术经验和/或骨盆骨的解剖变形。术后12周内未出现因术后治疗引起的并发症。只要在股骨柄与骨的稳定非骨水泥固定方面没有令人满意的解决方案,骨水泥金属股骨部件与陶瓷头的组合似乎是利用生物陶瓷材料良好物理和生化特性的合理折衷方案。林登霍夫假体的优点超过缺点:器械昂贵且术后需数月治疗。