• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人群体情况分类法:生成情境标准。

A taxonomy of situations for an elderly population: generating situational criteria.

作者信息

Scheidt R J, Schaie K W

出版信息

J Gerontol. 1978 Nov;33(6):848-57. doi: 10.1093/geronj/33.6.848.

DOI:10.1093/geronj/33.6.848
PMID:744859
Abstract

The present study examined the feasibility of a taxonomic strategy for generating situational criteria useful in the assessment of competence for older adults, with competence viewed as adaptive responding in specific situations. The first phase of the strategy involved (a) sampling a population of situations relevant to the experience of an older urban population, (b) selecting and empirically testing the reliability of four attribute dimensions (social-nonsocial; high-low activity; common-uncommon: supportive-depriving), which, in combination, taxonomized 16 classes of 80 situations, and (c) adapting these situations to a Q-sort technique. In the second phase, taxonomized situations were Q-sorted by 20 older individuals(x age = 71 years) on three response dimensions (self-rated ease of coping, affect, and frequency of encounter). Significant MANOVA main effects and interactions for each response dimension were found. Implications of this approach for generating ecologically-valid situational criteria useful in assessing adult competence are discussed.

摘要

本研究探讨了一种分类策略的可行性,该策略旨在生成有助于评估老年人能力的情境标准,其中能力被视为在特定情境中的适应性反应。该策略的第一阶段包括:(a) 对与老年城市人口经历相关的一系列情境进行抽样;(b) 选择并通过实证检验四个属性维度(社交-非社交;高-低活动度;常见-不常见;支持-剥夺)的可靠性,这四个维度相结合,将80种情境分类为16类;(c) 将这些情境改编为Q分类技术。在第二阶段,20名老年人(平均年龄 = 71岁)根据三个反应维度(自我评定的应对难易程度、情感和遭遇频率)对分类后的情境进行Q分类。研究发现,每个反应维度都存在显著的多变量方差分析主效应和交互作用。本文讨论了这种方法对于生成有助于评估成人能力的生态有效情境标准的意义。

相似文献

1
A taxonomy of situations for an elderly population: generating situational criteria.老年人群体情况分类法:生成情境标准。
J Gerontol. 1978 Nov;33(6):848-57. doi: 10.1093/geronj/33.6.848.
2
The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: a taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics.情境八钻石:情境特征主要维度的分类法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Oct;107(4):677-718. doi: 10.1037/a0037250. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
3
Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency.情境相似性和人格预测行为一致性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Aug;99(2):330-43. doi: 10.1037/a0019796.
4
Explorations in behavioral consistency: properties of persons, situations, and behaviors.行为一致性探索:个体、情境及行为的特性
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 May;60(5):773-94. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.60.5.773.
5
Attachment, positive affect, and competence in the peer group: two studies in construct validation.同伴群体中的依恋、积极情感与能力:两项结构效度研究
Child Dev. 1979 Sep;50(3):821-9.
6
The interrelationship between self-image disparity and social competence, defensive style, and adjustment status.自我形象差异与社会能力、防御方式及适应状况之间的相互关系。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1979 Sep;167(9):553-60. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197909000-00006.
7
The World at 7:00: Comparing the Experience of Situations Across 20 Countries.《7点的世界:比较20个国家的情境体验》
J Pers. 2016 Aug;84(4):493-509. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12176. Epub 2015 May 7.
8
An adjustment score for Q sorts.Q分类的调整分数。
J Consult Psychol. 1953 Oct;17(5):339-42. doi: 10.1037/h0055966.
9
Refining the measurement of axis II: a Q-sort procedure for assessing personality pathology.完善轴II的测量:一种评估人格病理学的Q分类法。
Assessment. 1998 Dec;5(4):333-53. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500403.
10
An investigation of classroom situational dimensions of emotional and behavioral adjustment and cognitive and social outcomes for Head Start children.对“启智计划”儿童情绪与行为调适以及认知和社会成果的课堂情境维度的调查。
Dev Psychol. 2008 Jan;44(1):139-54. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.139.