• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[250例急性穿孔性阑尾炎患者采用腹腔灌洗联合局部应用抗生素的治疗结果]

[Results of therapy combining peritoneal lavage and local application of antibiotics in 250 patients with acute perforating appendicitis].

作者信息

Duyzings J W, Wesdorp R I, Lemmens H A, Greep J M

出版信息

Chirurg. 1980 Aug;51(8):519-23.

PMID:7449555
Abstract

Since 1967, 2480 appendectomies have been performed at the St. Lucas Hospital (Amsterdam) and the St. Annadal Hospital (Maastricht), of which 250 were for perforated appendicitis. A so-called 'combined method' of treatment was used in all these cases: during the operation saline was used to lavage the peritoneal cavity with the patients in the reverse-Trendelenburg position. Antibiotics were left in the peritoneal cavity. No intraperitoneal drainage was performed, but the wound was drained for 5 days. Postoperative treatment consisted of nasogastric suction and parenteral antibiotics for 5 days in combination with anticoagulation. With thus combined approach one death was seen in 250 cases. There were 20 cases of wound infection (8%), 7 pelvic abscesses (2.8%), and 2 retroperitoneal abscesses. No thromboembolic complications were seen because of the use of routine anticoagulation. For 191 patients (77%), total hospitalization was less than 14 days. This method of treatment is compared with recent reports in literature.

摘要

自1967年以来,圣卢卡斯医院(阿姆斯特丹)和圣安娜达尔医院(马斯特里赫特)共进行了2480例阑尾切除术,其中250例为穿孔性阑尾炎。所有这些病例均采用了一种所谓的“联合治疗方法”:手术期间,患者处于反向特伦德伦伯卧位,用生理盐水冲洗腹腔。将抗生素留在腹腔内。未进行腹腔引流,但伤口引流5天。术后治疗包括持续胃肠减压、静脉注射抗生素5天并联合抗凝治疗。采用这种联合治疗方法,250例病例中有1例死亡。有20例伤口感染(8%),7例盆腔脓肿(2.8%),2例腹膜后脓肿。由于采用了常规抗凝治疗,未出现血栓栓塞并发症。191例患者(77%)的总住院时间少于14天。该治疗方法与文献中的近期报道进行了比较。

相似文献

1
[Results of therapy combining peritoneal lavage and local application of antibiotics in 250 patients with acute perforating appendicitis].[250例急性穿孔性阑尾炎患者采用腹腔灌洗联合局部应用抗生素的治疗结果]
Chirurg. 1980 Aug;51(8):519-23.
2
[Drainage of the abdominal cavity and complications in perforating appendicitis in children].[儿童穿孔性阑尾炎的腹腔引流及并发症]
Med Pregl. 2000 Mar-Apr;53(3-4):193-6.
3
Perforated appendicitis--lavage or drainage?穿孔性阑尾炎——灌洗还是引流?
Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn. 1975;64(4):195-7.
4
Antibiotics and postoperative abscesses in complicated appendicitis: is there any association?抗生素与复杂性阑尾炎术后脓肿:二者有关联吗?
Singapore Med J. 2008 Aug;49(8):615-8.
5
Comparative trial of four antibiotic combinations for perforated appendicitis in children.四种抗生素组合用于儿童穿孔性阑尾炎的对比试验。
Eur J Surg. 1997 Aug;163(8):591-6.
6
Vigorous wound irrigation followed by subcuticular skin closure in children with perforated appendicitis.对穿孔性阑尾炎患儿进行强力伤口冲洗,然后进行皮下皮肤缝合。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Mar;93(3):318-23.
7
[Acute appendicitis at the National University Hospital in Bangui, Central African Republic: epidemiologic, clinical, paraclinical and therapeutic aspects].[中非共和国班吉国立大学医院的急性阑尾炎:流行病学、临床、辅助检查及治疗方面]
Sante. 2001 Apr-Jun;11(2):117-25.
8
Can oral metronidazole substitute parenteral drug therapy in acute appendicitis? A new policy in the management of simple or complicated appendicitis with localized peritonitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.口服甲硝唑能否替代急性阑尾炎的胃肠外给药治疗?一项针对伴有局限性腹膜炎的单纯性或复杂性阑尾炎治疗的新政策:一项随机对照临床试验。
Am Surg. 1999 May;65(5):411-6.
9
Perforated appendicitis. A review of 225 cases.穿孔性阑尾炎。225例病例回顾。
Va Med Mon (1918). 1972 Jul;99(7):737-42.
10
[Relevance of cultures for the antibiotic treatment in acute perforated appendicitis].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 Dec 20;155(51):4173-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Proposed definitions for diagnosis, severity scoring, stratification, and outcome for trials on intraabdominal infection. Joint Working Party of SIS North America and Europe.腹腔内感染试验的诊断、严重程度评分、分层及预后的拟议定义。北美和欧洲外科感染学会联合工作组
World J Surg. 1990 Mar-Apr;14(2):148-58. doi: 10.1007/BF01664867.