• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Luteal function after tubal sterilization.

作者信息

Donnez J, Wauters M, Thomas K

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jan;57(1):65-8.

PMID:7454178
Abstract

The luteal function in women after tubal sterilization was evaluated and compared with a control group of women of a similar average age. Progesterone measurements and endometrial biopsies were obtained in the midluteal phase (5 to 10 days before the next menstrual period). The group of women who had been sterilized by tubal ligation or electrocoagulation had a significantly lower (P less than or equal to .001) mean midluteal progesterone level (8.5 +/- 6.0 ng/ml) than the group of women who had been sterilized by Hulka-Clemens clips (15.4 +/0 6.3 ng/ml) and the control group (17.2 +/- 4.8 ng/ml). The comparison between these 3 groups on days 19 and 20 and on days 21 and 22 gave the same statistical results. Progesterone levels were lower than 10 ng/ml in 54% of women after tubal ligation or electrocoagulation, whereas such low values were found in only 20% of women after sterilization by Hulka-Clemens clips and in 12% of the women in the control group. A retarded endometrium was observed more frequently in the women who underwent tubal ligation or electrocoagulation than in those who were sterilized by Hulka-Clemens clips. The most likely hypothesis to explain these differences is that sterilization using Hulda-Clemens clips preserves the continuity of the uteroovarian artery.

摘要

相似文献

1
Luteal function after tubal sterilization.
Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jan;57(1):65-8.
2
Luteal deficiency among women with normal menstrual cycles, requesting reversal of tubal sterilization.
Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Aug;54(2):189-92.
3
[Evaluation of the luteal function after sterilization by mid-luteal progesterone assay (author's transl)].
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1981 Jun;9(6):401-4.
4
[Sequelae of tubal ligation].[输卵管结扎的后遗症]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1985 Feb;53(334):35-7.
5
Hormone levels before and after tubal sterilization.
Contraception. 2006 May;73(5):507-11. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
6
Evaluation of ovarian function after tubal sterilization.输卵管绝育术后卵巢功能的评估。
J Reprod Med. 1982 Jul;27(7):376-84.
7
Corpus luteum function assessed by serial serum progesterone measurements after laparoscopic endotherm sterilization.
Acta Eur Fertil. 1985 May-Jun;16(3):169-73.
8
Luteal function declines after laparoscopic sterilization by Hulka or Filshie clips.
Contraception. 2000 Oct;62(4):177-80. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(00)00165-7.
9
Endometrial pathological changes after Fallopian ring tubal ligation.输卵管环扎术后子宫内膜的病理变化
Endoscopy. 1982 Jul;14(4):139-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021602.
10
An evaluation of late luteal phase endometrium in women requesting reversal of tubal ligation.对要求输卵管结扎复通的女性黄体晚期子宫内膜的评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jun;69(6):926-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The comparison of the degree of apoptosis in ovaries and fallopian tubes between two different surgical interventions for tubal ligation: A rat model.两种不同输卵管结扎手术干预方式下卵巢和输卵管细胞凋亡程度的比较:大鼠模型
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018 Mar 1;19(1):11-16. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2016.0192. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
2
Human fallopian tube epithelium co-culture with murine ovarian follicles reveals crosstalk in the reproductive cycle.人输卵管上皮与小鼠卵巢卵泡共培养揭示了生殖周期中的相互作用。
Mol Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;22(11):756-767. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaw041. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
3
Tubal ligation and risk of breast cancer.
输卵管结扎与乳腺癌风险
Br J Cancer. 2000 May;82(9):1600-4. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1182.
4
Corpus luteum dysfunction and the epidemiology of breast cancer: a reconsideration.黄体功能不全与乳腺癌流行病学:重新审视
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1981;1(4):287-96. doi: 10.1007/BF01806745.