Peeters M, Brugmans J
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1980;31 Suppl:233-7.
Postoperative pain relief is only apparently an easy task. A brief survey of literature investigating the discomfort experienced in the postoperative phase is all but encouraging. One can identify four basic problems in obtaining adequate results by delivery of analgesic drugs: a) the biological variability among individual patients, b) the unpredictable uptake of the drug administered intramuscularly, c) the time lag involved between request by the patient and the subsequent administration of a single dose and d) the lack of knowledge about the nature of the discomfort and its remedies. An alternative strategy introducing "On-Demand" analgesia administering prescribed doses at the right moment is presented and analysed a) as an operant conditioning process implementing a particular reinforcement schedule (behavioural sciences), as well as b) a negative feedback control loop that entrust the central judgement to the patient (system theory). Both approaches give insight into the results: the technique copes with biological variability; anticipating pain induced by fear disappears; the feedback strategy works well and patients adapt to a wide range in prescriptions; intermittent administration makes more efficient use of the analgesic; an optimal result is demonstrated in studies comparing on-demand analgesia with the normal IM-regime and epidural analgesia; continuity in pain relief can be obtained in routine clinical practice.
术后疼痛缓解表面上看似是一项简单的任务。对有关术后阶段不适体验的文献进行简要调查,结果并不令人鼓舞。在通过给予镇痛药获得充分效果方面,可以确定四个基本问题:a)个体患者之间的生物学差异;b)肌肉注射药物的吸收不可预测;c)患者提出请求与随后给予单剂量药物之间存在时间滞后;d)对不适的性质及其治疗方法缺乏了解。本文提出并分析了一种引入“按需”镇痛的替代策略,即在合适的时刻给予规定剂量的药物:a)作为一种实施特定强化程序的操作性条件反射过程(行为科学),以及b)一种将中央判断委托给患者的负反馈控制回路(系统理论)。这两种方法都有助于理解结果:该技术可应对生物学差异;由恐惧引起的预期性疼痛消失;反馈策略效果良好,患者能适应广泛的处方范围;间歇性给药能更有效地利用镇痛药;在将按需镇痛与常规肌肉注射方案和硬膜外镇痛进行比较的研究中显示出最佳效果;在常规临床实践中可实现疼痛缓解的连续性。