Aulick L H, Goodwin C W, Becker R A, Wilmore D W
Ann Surg. 1981 Jan;193(1):112-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198101000-00018.
To determine if visceral blood flow was altered by thermal injury, effective renal blood flow (ERBF) was measured by para-aminohippurate clearance in five control subjects and 13 nonbacteremic burn patients (mean burn size: 50% total body surface, range: 24.5-83.5) 6-25 days after burn injury. Splanchnic blood flow (SBF) and cardiac output were determined in a matched group of ten patients by indocyanine green clearance and dilution techniques, respectively. Renal and splanchnic oxygen consumptions (VO2) were calculated from regional arteriovenous O2 differences and blood flows. ERBF was not significantly elevated in these patients (780 +/- 68 ml/min x m2, mean +/- SE, versus 552 +/- 37 in controls). SBF, at 1463 +/- 96 ml/min x m2, was twice normal and 19% of the cardiac index (7764 +/- 393 ml/min x m2). Individual variations in ERBF and SBF were unrelated to burn size or the time after injury, but ERBF varied with 24-hour sodium excretion. Renal and splanchnic VO2 were twice normal levels at 33 +/- 6 and 66 +/- 4 ml/min, respectively. These results indicate that an increase in ERBF is not an obligatory response to burn injury, but is dependent on sodium load and/or vascular volume. Conversely, SBF is consistently increased by thermal injury and contributes to the rise in cardiac output after injury. While the increase of SBF is appropriate for the rise in local VO2, the cause of the apparent splanchnic vasodilation is unknown.
为了确定热损伤是否会改变内脏血流,在5名对照受试者和13名非菌血症烧伤患者(烧伤面积平均为全身表面积的50%,范围为24.5%-83.5%)烧伤后6至25天,通过对氨基马尿酸清除率测量有效肾血流量(ERBF)。在一组匹配的10名患者中,分别通过吲哚菁绿清除率和稀释技术测定内脏血流量(SBF)和心输出量。根据局部动静脉氧差和血流量计算肾和内脏的氧耗量(VO2)。这些患者的ERBF没有显著升高(780±68 ml/min·m2,平均值±标准误,而对照组为552±37)。SBF为1463±96 ml/min·m2,是正常水平的两倍,占心指数(7764±393 ml/min·m2)的19%。ERBF和SBF的个体差异与烧伤面积或受伤后的时间无关,但ERBF随24小时钠排泄量而变化。肾和内脏的VO2分别为正常水平的两倍,分别为33±6和66±4 ml/min。这些结果表明,ERBF增加不是烧伤损伤的必然反应,而是取决于钠负荷和/或血容量。相反,热损伤会持续增加SBF,并导致受伤后心输出量增加。虽然SBF的增加与局部VO2的增加相适应,但内脏明显血管舒张的原因尚不清楚。