• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者及医院特征对不良患者事件的影响。

Contribution of patient and hospital characteristics to adverse patient incidents.

作者信息

Elnicki R A, Schmitt J P

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1980 Winter;15(4):397-414.

PMID:7461973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1072190/
Abstract

The 1974 medical malpractice "crisis" brought about extensive legislation and insurance regulation in the United States. Hospitals in many states are now required to support risk management programs that include investigation and systematic analyses of adverse patient incidents. However, no research supports the hypothesis that systematic analysis of adverse patient incidents can identify contributory factors. In this study, a simple prediction model was used to estimate relationships between adverse incidents and selected patient and environmental characteristics in a large hospital. While some of the incident-characteristic relationships were significant, none of the estimated equations yielded results that could be logically translated into policy recommendations for the hospital. These results point to the need for further research. The benefits that positive research results would have for patients, hospitals, an the bill-paying public are obvious. Additional negative results would suggest that many legislative bodies and regulatory agencies were presumptions in requiring hospitals to conduct analyses of incidents.

摘要

1974年的医疗事故“危机”在美国引发了广泛的立法和保险监管。现在许多州要求医院支持风险管理项目,其中包括对不良患者事件进行调查和系统分析。然而,没有研究支持对不良患者事件进行系统分析能够识别促成因素这一假设。在本研究中,使用了一个简单的预测模型来估计一家大型医院中不良事件与选定的患者及环境特征之间的关系。虽然一些事件与特征之间的关系具有显著性,但所估计的方程中没有一个得出的结果能够合理地转化为针对该医院的政策建议。这些结果表明有必要进行进一步研究。积极的研究结果将给患者、医院和付费公众带来的益处是显而易见的。更多的负面结果则表明许多立法机构和监管机构在要求医院对事件进行分析方面是主观臆断的。

相似文献

1
Contribution of patient and hospital characteristics to adverse patient incidents.患者及医院特征对不良患者事件的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1980 Winter;15(4):397-414.
2
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.
3
What can we learn about patient safety from information sources within an acute hospital: a step on the ladder of integrated risk management?从急性医院内部的信息源中,我们能了解到哪些关于患者安全的信息:综合风险管理阶梯上的一步?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):209-15. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020008.
4
Do falls and falls-injuries in hospital indicate negligent care -- and how big is the risk? A retrospective analysis of the NHS Litigation Authority Database of clinical negligence claims, resulting from falls in hospitals in England 1995 to 2006.医院内的跌倒及跌倒致伤是否表明存在护理疏忽——风险有多大?对英国国民医疗服务诉讼局1995年至2006年期间因医院内跌倒引发的临床疏忽索赔数据库进行的回顾性分析。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):431-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024703.
5
Medication errors: an analysis comparing PHICO's closed claims data and PHICO's Event Reporting Trending System (PERTS).用药差错:一项比较PHICO的结案索赔数据与PHICO事件报告趋势系统(PERTS)的分析。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;43(7):754-9.
6
Hospital accidents and incidents: what a new reporting system has found.医院事故与事件:一项新报告系统的发现
Hosp Secur Saf Manage. 1987 Oct;8(6):5-9.
7
Falls in English and Welsh hospitals: a national observational study based on retrospective analysis of 12 months of patient safety incident reports.英格兰和威尔士医院的跌倒事件:一项基于对12个月患者安全事件报告进行回顾性分析的全国性观察研究。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):424-30. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024695.
8
Trends in healthcare incident reporting and relationship to safety and quality data in acute hospitals: results from the National Reporting and Learning System.急症医院医疗事件报告趋势及其与安全和质量数据的关系:来自国家报告和学习系统的结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):5-10. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022400.
9
[Patient safety and risk management].[患者安全与风险管理]
Med Klin (Munich). 2005 Aug 15;100(8):478-85. doi: 10.1007/s00063-005-1061.
10
Reducing medication errors and increasing patient safety: case studies in clinical pharmacology.减少用药错误并提高患者安全性:临床药理学案例研究
J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;43(7):768-83.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review.基于证据的医院环境中导致患者安全事件因素框架的制定:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 May;21(5):369-80. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000443. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
2
An information theoretic method for classifying patients according to the risk of adverse hospital incidents.一种根据不良医院事件风险对患者进行分类的信息论方法。
J Med Syst. 1986 Apr;10(2):195-208. doi: 10.1007/BF00993125.
3
Malpractice: a case-control study of claimants.医疗事故:索赔者的病例对照研究
J Gen Intern Med. 1990 May-Jun;5(3):244-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02600543.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical malpractice.医疗事故
Sci Am. 1976 Aug;235(2):18-23. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0876-18.
2
Medical malpractice and negligence. Sociodemographic characteristics of claimants and nonclaimants.医疗事故与过失。索赔者和非索赔者的社会人口统计学特征。
JAMA. 1977 Oct 10;238(15):1656-8.
3
Risk management: idea and effort widely supported, but appropriate methods debated.风险管理:理念与努力获得广泛支持,但恰当的方法存在争议。
Hospitals. 1979 Apr 1;53(7):175-80.