Roth G L, Kochhar R K, Hind J E
J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 Dec;68(6):1643-51. doi: 10.1121/1.385196.
Interaural time differences (ITDs) were measured from 400--7000 Hz on cats in order to provide quantitative data for use in physiological/behavioral studies on sound localization. ITDs derived from clicks and the initial portion of tone bursts showed a pronounced roughness and frequency dependence. This frequency dependence is most evident at higher angles of incidence and indicates that a single ITD will not always represent a single position on the azimuth. Controls demonstrate that most of the roughness in these functions was due to reflections off the surface supporting the animal and that the measured ITDs corresponded to predictions made by steady-state theory. Measurements made with and without the pinnae in position indicate that they have relatively little effect on these ITD functions, particularly for frequencies below 2500 Hz and for small angles of incidence. In spite of acoustic limitations exemplified by the roughness and frequency dependence of these functions, ITDs generated by sound sources situated close to the midline provide reliable localization cues that are much better than those derived from sources well out on the azimuth. Finally, it is noted that another ITD, the group ITD, can be ascribed to an acoustic signal. Calculations based on the measured steady-state ITDs show differences between the group and steady-state ITDs over a given range of frequencies. Differences between the group and steady-state ITD can be significant, and it is argued that: (1) The group ITD can provide a localization cue to the auditory system that is distinct from the steady-state ITD; and (2) it is possible these group ITDs are used by the nervous system to localize sound sources in realistic situations.
为了提供用于声音定位的生理/行为学研究的定量数据,在猫身上测量了400 - 7000Hz的双耳时间差(ITD)。从咔嗒声和短纯音起始部分得出的ITD显示出明显的粗糙度和频率依赖性。这种频率依赖性在较高入射角时最为明显,表明单个ITD并不总是代表方位上的单个位置。对照实验表明,这些函数中的大部分粗糙度是由于动物支撑表面的反射造成的,并且测量得到的ITD与稳态理论的预测相符。在有耳廓和无耳廓的情况下进行的测量表明,耳廓对这些ITD函数的影响相对较小,特别是对于低于2500Hz的频率和小入射角。尽管这些函数的粗糙度和频率依赖性体现了声学限制,但靠近中线的声源产生的ITD提供了可靠的定位线索,比来自方位外侧声源的线索要好得多。最后,需要指出的是,另一种ITD,即群延迟差(group ITD),也可归因于声学信号。基于测量得到的稳态ITD进行的计算表明,在给定频率范围内,群延迟差和稳态ITD之间存在差异。群延迟差和稳态ITD之间的差异可能很大,并且有人认为:(1)群延迟差可以为听觉系统提供与稳态ITD不同的定位线索;(2)在实际情况下,神经系统有可能利用这些群延迟差来定位声源。