Amidon G L, Kou J, Elliott R L, Lightfoot E N
J Pharm Sci. 1980 Dec;69(12):1369-73. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600691204.
In determining intestinal wall permeabilities, several mass transport models may be applied to analyze the results from external perfusion experiments. The appropriateness of any given model depends on the applicability of the model assumptions to the experimental system. This report compares several mass transport models with respect to their assumptions and applicability to a particular experimental design. The models are shown to differ in their assumptions regarding convection and diffusion in the perfusing fluid. However, since the wall permeability is an unknown parameter in each model and is estimated from the data, all of the models fit the mass transfer results reasonably well, despite fundamentally different assumptions. However, the determined permeabilities differ. Residence time distribution analysis of the experimental system is more sensitive to the model assumptions. It is shown that, in a particular experimental system, laminar flow in a cylindrical tube is the most appropriate model. The model also has the advantage of implicitly accounting for the convection-diffusion problem in the perfusing fluid. Hence, the diffusion layer thickness is not estimated from the data. With the hydrodynamics defined, the relative permeabilities resulting from the application of the several models to the data can be interpreted. The wall permeability determined in the suggested manner provides an estimate of the limiting assistance under perfect mixing conditions.
在确定肠壁通透性时,可以应用几种传质模型来分析外部灌注实验的结果。任何给定模型的适用性取决于模型假设对实验系统的适用性。本报告比较了几种传质模型的假设及其对特定实验设计的适用性。结果表明,这些模型在关于灌注液中对流和扩散的假设方面存在差异。然而,由于壁通透性在每个模型中都是一个未知参数,并且是从数据中估计出来的,尽管假设根本不同,但所有模型都能较好地拟合传质结果。然而,所确定的通透性有所不同。实验系统的停留时间分布分析对模型假设更为敏感。结果表明,在特定的实验系统中,圆柱形管中的层流是最合适的模型。该模型还具有隐含考虑灌注液中对流扩散问题的优点。因此,扩散层厚度不是从数据中估计出来的。在确定了流体动力学之后,可以解释将几种模型应用于数据所得到的相对通透性。以建议的方式确定的壁通透性提供了在完美混合条件下极限协助的估计值。