Claridge G
Schizophr Bull. 1978;4(2):186-209. doi: 10.1093/schbul/4.2.186.
Some of the difficulties of trying to establish an animal model of schizophrenia are first considered. Then, after a review of the evidence on the experimental psychopathology of schizophrenia, particularly that concerned with attention and arousal, it is concluded that the core feature which needs to be modeled in animals is some aspect of "input dysfunction." It is argued that, of the pharmacological strategies, LSD-25 comes nearest to meeting that requirement, for two reasons. First, the phenomenology of an LSD "model psychosis" closely parallels that of the natural disease. Secondly, the experimental effects of the drug, both in animals and man, are very similar to or can be closely aligned theoretically with those of schizophrenia. An example is quoted from work in the author's laboratory where LSD was found to produce psychophysiological effects virtually identical to those observed occurring naturally in acute psychotic patients and in normal subjects high in "psychotic" personality traits. It is suggested that the rejection of LSD as a drug model was premature, especially as the currently popular preference for amphetamine has not been vindicated, either by the latter's ability to mimic an important central feature of the psychotic state or by work on dopamine as a specific common mediator of amphetamine psychosis and of schizophrenia.
首先考虑了建立精神分裂症动物模型所面临的一些困难。然后,在回顾了关于精神分裂症实验性精神病理学的证据,特别是与注意力和唤醒有关的证据后,得出结论:需要在动物身上模拟的核心特征是“输入功能障碍”的某个方面。有人认为,在药理学策略中,LSD-25最接近满足这一要求,原因有两个。第一,LSD“模型精神病”的现象学与自然疾病的现象学非常相似。第二,该药物在动物和人类身上的实验效果与精神分裂症的效果非常相似,或者在理论上可以紧密联系起来。引用了作者实验室的一项研究为例,在该研究中发现LSD产生的心理生理效应实际上与急性精神病患者和具有高“精神病”人格特质的正常受试者自然发生的效应相同。有人认为,将LSD作为药物模型予以摒弃为时过早,特别是因为目前对安非他明的普遍偏好尚未得到证实,无论是通过安非他明模拟精神病状态的重要核心特征的能力,还是通过将多巴胺作为安非他明精神病和精神分裂症的特定共同介质的研究。