Polin J I, Knox I, Baumgart S, Campman E, Mennuti M T, Polin R A
Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Feb;57(2):233-7.
Rapid and accurate detection of neonatal bacteremia is an important part of the management of the neonate with suspected sepsis. This study compared the incidence of positive umbilical cord blood cultures (UCBCs) to the incidence of positive peripheral venous blood cultures and determined whether a meticulous UCBC technique prevented contamination of culture specimens. Six UCBCs of the 200 sampled were positive. Three cultures exhibited delayed growth (more than 48 hours) and were not considered clinically significant. In 2 of the 3 remaining positive cultures were organisms considered contaminants; the third culture correlated to the infant's peripheral venous blood culture (alpha-hemolytic streptococcus), showing evidence of bacteremia. From these data the authors conclude that 1) meticulous and fastidious collection of UCBCs prevents contamination of culture specimens, and 2) the UCBC may prove to be a satisfactory alternative to the postnatal peripheral venous blood culture for detection of neonatal bacteremia.
快速准确地检测新生儿菌血症是疑似败血症新生儿管理的重要组成部分。本研究比较了脐带血培养阳性(UCBC)的发生率与外周静脉血培养阳性的发生率,并确定了细致的UCBC技术是否能防止培养标本污染。在200份采样的UCBC中,有6份呈阳性。3份培养物显示生长延迟(超过48小时),不被认为具有临床意义。在其余3份阳性培养物中,有2份培养出的微生物被认为是污染物;第三份培养物与婴儿的外周静脉血培养结果相关(α溶血性链球菌),显示有菌血症证据。根据这些数据,作者得出结论:1)细致且严格地采集UCBC可防止培养标本污染;2)对于检测新生儿菌血症,UCBC可能被证明是出生后外周静脉血培养的一种令人满意的替代方法。