Spielmann W, Kühnl P
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1980 Nov 7;92(21):764-8.
In four affiliation cases with two or three brothers involved as putative fathers, exclusions of non-fathers were obtained by the application of the so-called isoelectrofocusing systems (twice by PiM subtypes, once by PGM1, TfC and Gc1 subtypes) as well as by GPT and the extended Gm system. In three cases a discrimination between the involved brothers was possible, in a fourth case both brothers were excluded from paternity. Special problems of anthropological expertises and of biostatistics in cases with closely related putative fathers are discussed. Possibilities to refute false statements of the alleged men, claiming sexual intercourse of the mother with their own relatives in order to invalidate positive biostatistical evidence, are pointed out.
在4起亲子关系鉴定案例中,有两到三个兄弟被当作推定父亲,通过应用所谓的等电聚焦系统(两次依据PiM亚型,一次依据PGM1、TfC和Gc1亚型)以及GPT和扩展Gm系统,排除了非父亲个体。在3起案例中能够区分涉案兄弟,在第4起案例中,两个兄弟均被排除亲子关系。文中讨论了在推定父亲关系密切的案例中人类学专业知识和生物统计学方面的特殊问题。指出了反驳被指控男子的虚假陈述的可能性,这些人声称母亲与他们自己的亲属发生了性关系,以此来使阳性生物统计学证据无效。