Suppr超能文献

[血型专家评估:检测范围与亲子鉴定可靠性之间的关系。关于修订和指南的思考]

[Blood group expert evaluation: relation between the extent of testing and the reliability of paternity determination. Reflections on revision and guidelines].

作者信息

Spielmann W, Kühnl P

出版信息

Z Rechtsmed. 1983;90(1):35-44. doi: 10.1007/BF01886065.

Abstract

In affiliation cases a combined exclusion chance for non-fathers of 99.995% is obtained by the examination of well-established blood group systems. In complicated cases, i.e. if known putative fathers are unavailable, the biostatistical limits for the ascertainment of paternity are obviously very high. They have to be determined by court in each particular case. For routine cases the application of an extended basic blood group expertise, including 19 systems with an combined exclusion chance of 95.17% is considered to be sufficient. The analysis of 263 own filiation cases from 1979 to 1982 yielded an average realistic prior probability of paternity of 83.3%, in 52 many-man affairs even of 90.3%. A similar percentage (89.5%) was observed in 67 two-man affairs of contested legitimacy. Since the father is rarely found among men included at a later stage the rate of children without known father is estimated at 5-15%.

摘要

在亲子关系鉴定案例中,通过检测成熟的血型系统,非父亲的综合排除概率可达99.995%。在复杂案例中,即如果已知的推定父亲无法获取,确定亲子关系的生物统计学界限显然非常高。必须由法院在每个具体案例中予以确定。对于常规案例,应用扩展的基本血型鉴定技术,包括19个系统,综合排除概率为95.17%,被认为是足够的。对1979年至1982年的263例亲生关系案例进行分析,得出亲子关系的平均实际先验概率为83.3%,在52例多人涉案的案例中甚至达到90.3%。在67例有争议合法性的两人涉案案例中也观察到类似的百分比(89.5%)。由于在后期纳入的男性中很少能找到父亲,估计不知父亲身份的儿童比例为5%至15%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验