Fasth S, Hultén L, Palselius I
Acta Chir Scand. 1980;146(3):203-7.
Right-sided transverse colostomy and loop ileostomy when temporary used for protecting a new-constructed colorectal anastomosis were compared in two matched series of patients. The relative safety of the methods as expressed in complication rate on construction and subsequent closure and any difficulties associated with stoma care were assessed. The results indicate that a loop ileostomy, when properly constructed is well born even in elderly patients and is followed by a remarkably swift convalescence. Construction and closure appeared not to be associated with more difficulties or complications than transverse colostomy. As far as stoma care is concerned, transverse colostomy offered, if anything, more difficulties than the loop ileostomy. With modern appliances a loop ileostomy presents no more problems than a well-established conventional end ileostomy, and since a loop ileostomy is a more reliable defunctioning stoma than the transverse colostomy, it should probably be preferred when the primary purpose is to protect a colorectal anastomosis.
在两组匹配的患者系列中,对右侧横结肠造口术和袢式回肠造口术(临时用于保护新构建的结直肠吻合口时)进行了比较。评估了这些方法在造口构建和随后关闭时的并发症发生率所体现的相对安全性,以及与造口护理相关的任何困难。结果表明,袢式回肠造口术如果构建得当,即使在老年患者中也能很好地耐受,并且随后恢复迅速。与横结肠造口术相比,其造口构建和关闭似乎不会带来更多困难或并发症。就造口护理而言,横结肠造口术即便有差异的话,也比袢式回肠造口术带来更多困难。使用现代器具时,袢式回肠造口术并不比成熟的传统末端回肠造口术带来更多问题,而且由于袢式回肠造口术作为一种使肠管失去功能的造口比横结肠造口术更可靠,当主要目的是保护结直肠吻合口时,它可能更值得首选。