Suppr超能文献

癌症死亡证明的准确性及其对癌症死亡率统计的影响。

Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on cancer mortality statistics.

作者信息

Percy C, Stanek E, Gloeckler L

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1981 Mar;71(3):242-50. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.3.242.

Abstract

A study to determine the accuracy of cancer mortality data was done using cancer deaths occurring during 1970 and 1971 in eight of the nine areas included in the Third National Cancer Survey (TNCS). Death certificates with an underlying cause of death of cancer were compared to the hospital diagnosis for 48,826 resident cases of single primary cancers. The underlying cause of death as coded on the death certificate was found to be accurate for about 65 per cent of the cancer deaths in this study. Misclassification problems occurred for colorectal cancer, the second leading cause of death from cancer. Colon cancer was overreported and rectal cancer was under-reported on death certificates. Other misclassification problems were found for cancers of the uterus, brain, and buccal cavity including most of its sub-sites. Physicians tended to report a non-specific site of cancer on the death certificate rather than the specific site identified by the hospital diagnosis.

摘要

一项旨在确定癌症死亡率数据准确性的研究,利用了第三次全国癌症调查(TNCS)所涵盖的九个地区中的八个地区在1970年和1971年期间发生的癌症死亡病例。将潜在死因列为癌症的死亡证明与48826例单一原发性癌症住院病例的医院诊断结果进行了比较。在本研究中,发现死亡证明上编码的潜在死因约65%的癌症死亡病例是准确的。结直肠癌作为癌症的第二大死因出现了错误分类问题。在死亡证明上,结肠癌报告过多,直肠癌报告过少。子宫、脑和口腔(包括其大部分亚部位)癌症也存在其他错误分类问题。医生倾向于在死亡证明上报告癌症的非特定部位,而不是医院诊断所确定的特定部位。

相似文献

4
Death certificates are not reliable: revivification of the autopsy.死亡证明不可靠:尸检的复苏。
South Med J. 2006 Jul;99(7):728-33. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000224337.77074.57.
10
Autopsy Service Death Certificate Review.尸检服务死亡证明审查。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Sep 1;144(9):1092-1096. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0452-OA.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验