Pachter H L, Hofstetter S R
Arch Surg. 1981 Mar;116(3):318-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380150046012.
To compare the accuracy and safety of open abdominal paracentesis and lavage vs percutaneous paracentesis and lavage, 210 consecutive patients were prospectively randomized into two groups of 105 each. There were no false-negative diagnoses in either group. The accuracy rate for the open method was 98.1%, and 91.4% for the percutaneous method. Six major complications were encountered with the percutaneous method, for a complication rate of 5.7% compared with no major complications with the open method. The results suggest that the open technique is superior to the percutaneous method.
为比较开放性腹腔穿刺放液及灌洗与经皮腹腔穿刺放液及灌洗的准确性和安全性,210例连续患者被前瞻性随机分为两组,每组105例。两组均未出现假阴性诊断。开放性方法的准确率为98.1%,经皮方法的准确率为91.4%。经皮方法出现6例严重并发症,并发症发生率为5.7%,而开放性方法未出现严重并发症。结果表明开放性技术优于经皮方法。