Cochran W, Sobat W S
Ann Surg. 1984 Jul;200(1):24-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198407000-00004.
A total of 118 trauma patients were prospectively randomized to receive either open or closed peritoneal lavage. In addition, comparisons were made between using an infraumbilical versus a supraumbilical approach in patients with pelvic fractures. No statistical difference was noted between the open and closed groups, despite the overall accuracy rate of 96.6%. The supraumbilical approach was vastly superior to the infraumbilical approach in patients with pelvic fracture with an accuracy rate of 90.9% versus 57%. In this regard, use of the infraumbilical approach in this setting is to be highly discouraged. Finally, patient body habitus, technique, and physician experience all play a role in the outcome of the lavage.
总共118名创伤患者被前瞻性随机分组,分别接受开放或闭合性腹腔灌洗。此外,对骨盆骨折患者采用脐下与脐上入路进行了比较。尽管总体准确率为96.6%,但开放组和闭合组之间未发现统计学差异。在骨盆骨折患者中,脐上入路远优于脐下入路,准确率分别为90.9%和57%。在这种情况下,强烈不建议使用脐下入路。最后,患者体型、技术和医生经验都会对灌洗结果产生影响。