• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用咪康唑涂层棉塞治疗外阴阴道念珠菌感染。

Treatment off vulvovaginal candidal infection with miconazole-coated tampons.

作者信息

Bergstein N A

出版信息

Br J Vener Dis. 1980 Dec;56(6):408-11. doi: 10.1136/sti.56.6.408.

DOI:10.1136/sti.56.6.408
PMID:7470219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1045843/
Abstract

In an evaluation of three different treatment regimens miconazole-coated tampons proved to be effective for the relief of vulvovaginal candidal infection. A mycological and clinical cure rate of about 93% was achieved in patients treated with one tampon twice daily (up to a total of 15 tampons); 61% of patients were mycologically cured with a regimen of one tampon daily for only five days. Reinfection rates were less than 4% with all three regimens. The tampons were well accepted by all the patients.

摘要

在一项对三种不同治疗方案的评估中,咪康唑涂层棉塞被证明对缓解外阴阴道念珠菌感染有效。每天使用一个棉塞两次(最多共15个棉塞)进行治疗的患者,真菌学和临床治愈率约为93%;每天使用一个棉塞、仅持续五天的治疗方案使61%的患者实现真菌学治愈。所有三种治疗方案的再感染率均低于4%。所有患者对这些棉塞的接受度都很高。

相似文献

1
Treatment off vulvovaginal candidal infection with miconazole-coated tampons.使用咪康唑涂层棉塞治疗外阴阴道念珠菌感染。
Br J Vener Dis. 1980 Dec;56(6):408-11. doi: 10.1136/sti.56.6.408.
2
Comparison of miconazole-coated tampons with clotrimazole vaginal tablets in the treatment of vaginal candidosis.咪康唑涂层棉塞与克霉唑阴道片治疗阴道念珠菌病的比较。
Br J Vener Dis. 1981 Aug;57(4):275-8. doi: 10.1136/sti.57.4.275.
3
Double-blind evaluation of miconazole tampons, compared with clotrimazole vaginal tablets, in vaginal candidiasis.咪康唑栓剂与克霉唑阴道片治疗阴道念珠菌病的双盲评估。
Clin Ther. 1981;4(3):212-6.
4
Candidal vaginitis. A study of the efficacy of a reduced duration treatment with miconazole nitrate.念珠菌性阴道炎。硝酸咪康唑缩短疗程治疗的疗效研究。
Practitioner. 1979 Apr;222(1330):564-7.
5
A shortened regime for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidosis with a new presentation of miconazole.一种采用新型咪康唑制剂治疗外阴阴道念珠菌病的缩短疗程方案。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1980 Jun;10(5):319-24. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(80)90079-9.
6
Single dose treatment of vaginal candidosis: comparison of clotrimazole and isoconazole.阴道念珠菌病的单剂量治疗:克霉唑与异康唑的比较
Br J Vener Dis. 1984 Feb;60(1):42-4. doi: 10.1136/sti.60.1.42.
7
[Mycoses in obstetrical and gynecological pathology. The use of miconazole in new preparations in the local therapy of mycotic vaginitis].[妇产科病理学中的真菌病。咪康唑在新型制剂中用于霉菌性阴道炎局部治疗的应用]
Minerva Ginecol. 1981 Sep;33(9):857-62.
8
A dose-response study with Monistat cream.一项关于达克宁霜的剂量反应研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Feb;53(2):250-3.
9
Evaluation of Monistat cream (miconazole nitrate 2%) in a reduced regimen for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis.评估达克宁霜(2%硝酸咪康唑)简化疗程治疗外阴阴道念珠菌病的效果。
J Reprod Med. 1977 Aug;19(2):67-9.
10
Butoconazole nitrate 2% for vulvovaginal candidiasis. New, single-dose vaginal cream formulation vs. seven-day treatment with miconazole nitrate. Gynazole 1 Study Group.2%硝酸布康唑治疗外阴阴道念珠菌病。新型单剂量阴道乳膏剂型与硝酸咪康唑七日疗法的对比。Gynazole 1研究组。
J Reprod Med. 1999 Nov;44(11):933-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Single dose treatment of vaginal candidosis: comparison of clotrimazole and isoconazole.阴道念珠菌病的单剂量治疗:克霉唑与异康唑的比较
Br J Vener Dis. 1984 Feb;60(1):42-4. doi: 10.1136/sti.60.1.42.

本文引用的文献

1
[Clotrimazole vaginal tablets--clinical assessment in an open trial].克霉唑阴道片——开放试验的临床评估
Arzneimittelforschung. 1972 Aug;22(8):1291-4.
2
Letter: Vaginal candidosis.信函:阴道念珠菌病。
Br Med J. 1976 Mar 20;1(6011):712-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6011.712-d.
3
Miconazole: a review of its antifungal activity and therapeutic efficacy.咪康唑:对其抗真菌活性及治疗效果的综述
Drugs. 1975;9(6):406-23. doi: 10.2165/00003495-197509060-00002.
4
The use of povidone-iodine ('Betadine') pessaries in the treatment of candidal and trichomonal vaginitis.聚维酮碘(“碘伏”)阴道栓剂在念珠菌性和滴虫性阴道炎治疗中的应用。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1975;3(3):157-62. doi: 10.1185/03007997509113664.