Gaynor J, Hargreaves W A
Community Ment Health J. 1980 Winter;16(4):283-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00821560.
The present study surveyed federally-funded emergency psychiatric programs in 33 California community mental health centers (CMHCs). Four aspects of service organization were examined: (1) the availability of various response styles (telephone service, walk-in service, follow-up home visits, mobile initial response); (2) the types of staff providing the service; (3) the location of the programs, and (4) the organizational setting of the CMHCs (consortium or single agency centers). From these characteristics of service organization two contrasting types of emergency psychiatric programs were derived--the "emergency room" and "mobile response" models. The relationship between these two models of service delivery and catchment area demographic characteristics was examined and no remarkable trends emerged. The implications of developing a typology of emergency psychiatric programs are discussed with respect to a scheme for evaluating the relative effectiveness of services and for planning future programs.
本研究对加利福尼亚州33个社区心理健康中心(CMHCs)中由联邦政府资助的紧急精神病项目进行了调查。研究考察了服务组织的四个方面:(1)各种应对方式的可用性(电话服务、即到即服务、后续家访、移动初始响应);(2)提供服务的工作人员类型;(3)项目的地点,以及(4)社区心理健康中心的组织环境(财团或单一机构中心)。从服务组织的这些特征中得出了两种截然不同的紧急精神病项目类型——“急诊室”和“移动响应”模式。研究考察了这两种服务提供模式与集水区人口特征之间的关系,未发现显著趋势。文中讨论了制定紧急精神病项目类型学对于评估服务相对有效性的方案以及规划未来项目的意义。