Rodick J D, Henggeler S W
Child Dev. 1980 Dec;51(4):1126-32.
56 low-achieving seventh-grade students in a predominantly black, inner-city junior high school were randomly assigned to one of four groups (SMART, PUSH, Standard Reading, or Nonintervention). The highly structured, school-based SMART program employed nonprofessional tutors to improve the academic skills and attitudes of the adolescents. The home-based PUSH program involved parents in restructuring the home environment to foster educational development. The Standard Reading group was the usual school reading class, and the Nonintervention group did not receive any special remediation. A battery of standardized educational and attitudinal tests was administered to each student (a) immediately before assignment to groups, (b) immediately after termination of the 10-week programs, and (c) at 6-month follow-up. Results from the 4 x 3 analysis of variance clearly demonstrated the short- and long-term efficacy of the SMART program and the long-term efficacy of the PUSH program. Each produced substantial increases in both the acquisition of fundamental academic skills and achievement motivation. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.
在一所主要为黑人学生的市中心初中,56名成绩较差的七年级学生被随机分配到四个组之一(SMART组、PUSH组、标准阅读组或无干预组)。高度结构化的、基于学校的SMART项目聘请非专业辅导员来提高青少年的学术技能和态度。基于家庭的PUSH项目让家长参与重组家庭环境以促进教育发展。标准阅读组是常规的学校阅读课,无干预组未接受任何特殊辅导。在(a)分组前、(b)10周项目结束后以及(c)6个月随访时,对每个学生进行了一系列标准化教育和态度测试。4×3方差分析结果清楚地表明了SMART项目的短期和长期效果以及PUSH项目的长期效果。两者都使基本学术技能的获得和成就动机有了显著提高。讨论了这些发现的意义和未来研究的方向。