Suppr超能文献

临床实践的项目监测。不同尿液采集方法的样本阳性率。

Program monitoring for clinical practice. Specimen positivity across urine collection methods.

作者信息

Moran J, Mayberry C, Kinniburgh D, James D

机构信息

Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission, West End Treatment Center, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 1995 May-Jun;12(3):223-6. doi: 10.1016/0740-5472(95)00010-3.

Abstract

Urinalysis is a primary component of methadone programming. A clinic-based study was conducted to determine whether unsupervised urine collection is as reliable as other methods for detecting unauthorized drug use among methadone treatment clients. Drug positivity rates compared over a 30-week period revealed no significant differences as a function of collection method. Results confirm the efficacy of unsupervised urine collection using a heat sensitive strip or temperature indicator. Study findings also offer evidence to support clinical practice designed to ensure client privacy and dignity while maintaining standards for effective program monitoring.

摘要

尿液分析是美沙酮治疗项目的一个主要组成部分。一项基于诊所的研究旨在确定无监督尿液采集在检测美沙酮治疗患者中未经授权使用药物方面是否与其他方法一样可靠。在30周的时间里对药物阳性率进行比较,结果显示采集方法与阳性率之间没有显著差异。结果证实了使用热敏试纸或温度指示器进行无监督尿液采集的有效性。研究结果还为旨在确保患者隐私和尊严同时维持有效项目监测标准的临床实践提供了支持证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验