Häberle H, Anders N, Pham D T, Wollensak J
Augenklinik im Virchow-Klinikum Medizinische Fakultät, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1995 Sep;207(3):176-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035364.
For planned extracapsular cataract extraction the no-stitch technique with 11-mm tunnel width has been well established. Four modifications of wound closure were performed to further reduce surgically induced astigmatism.
In this prospective study we controlled 250 eyes of 250 consecutive patients 4 months after surgery with four different wound constructions: sutureless wound closure (n = 70), singular perpendicular suture (n = 100), cross suture (n = 40) in 12 o'clock position or sutureless wound closure in temporal position (n = 40).
Surgically 'Induced Astigmatism' was for eyes with preoperative 'With the Rule Astigmatism' (vs Against the Rule astigmatism), operation in 12 o'clock position and sutureless wound closure 2.22 +/- 0.77 D (1.66 +/- 0.94 D), with perpendicular suture 1.66 +/- 0.93 D (1.24 +/- 0.82 D), and with cross suture 1.47 +/- 0.96 D (0.9 +/- 1.13 D). Temporal incision was only performed in preoperative 'Against-the-Rule-Astigmatism' eyes and resulted in 0.6 D of 'Induced Astigmatism'. Preoperative average astigmatism was 0.86 +/- 0.68 D (1.01 +/- 0.95 D).
For preoperative 'With the Rule Astigmatism', operation in 12 o'clock position and singular perpendicular suture and for 'Against the Rule Astigmatism' (especially > 1.5 D) temporal incision is recommended.
对于计划性囊外白内障摘除术,11毫米隧道宽度的无缝线技术已得到充分确立。进行了四种伤口闭合方式的改良,以进一步减少手术引起的散光。
在这项前瞻性研究中,我们对250例连续患者的250只眼在术后4个月时采用四种不同的伤口构建方式进行了对照:无缝线伤口闭合(n = 70)、单根垂直缝线(n = 100)、12点位的交叉缝线(n = 40)或颞侧无缝线伤口闭合(n = 40)。
对于术前为顺规散光(与逆规散光相比)、在12点位手术且采用无缝线伤口闭合的眼睛,手术引起的散光为2.22±0.77 D(1.66±0.94 D);采用垂直缝线时为1.66±0.93 D(1.24±0.82 D);采用交叉缝线时为1.47±0.96 D(0.9±1.13 D)。颞侧切口仅在术前为逆规散光的眼睛中进行,导致0.6 D的手术引起的散光。术前平均散光为0.86±0.68 D(1.01±0.95 D)。
对于术前顺规散光,建议在12点位手术并采用单根垂直缝线;对于逆规散光(尤其是>1.5 D),建议采用颞侧切口。