Drosch S, Pham D T, Wollensak J
Augenklinik, Klinikum Rudolf Virchow der Freien Universität Berlin.
Ophthalmologe. 1994 Aug;91(4):434-8.
Like the type of wound opening, wound closure has an important influence on postoperative astigmatism. In a series of 300 patients, for 1 year we examined postoperative astigmatism after cataract surgery with sutured scleral wound closure and the no-stitch technique. In the early postoperative period, the no-stitch technique. (1.00 dpt +/- 0.83) had less induced astigmatism (vector analysis of Jaffé), compared with sutured scleral wound closure (1.77 dpt +/- 1.36), as well as a smaller standard deviation. Furthermore, with the no-stitch technique a nearly stable situation is reached within the first 4 weeks. In the late postoperative period, the astigmatism induced after sutured scleral wound closure (1.01 dpt +/- 0.57) is only a little greater than with the no-stitch technique (0.85 dpt +/- 0.65). On both techniques more than every second patient shows astigmatism (sutured scleral wound closure: 61%; no-stitch technique: 52%).
与伤口开口类型一样,伤口闭合对术后散光有重要影响。在一组300例患者中,我们对采用巩膜伤口缝合关闭和无缝合技术的白内障手术后的术后散光进行了为期1年的检查。在术后早期,无缝合技术(1.00屈光度±0.83)与巩膜伤口缝合关闭(1.77屈光度±1.36)相比,诱导散光较少(Jaffé矢量分析),且标准差较小。此外,采用无缝合技术在术后4周内可达到近乎稳定的状态。在术后晚期,巩膜伤口缝合关闭后诱导的散光(1.01屈光度±0.57)仅比无缝合技术(0.85屈光度±0.65)略高。两种技术中,超过半数的患者出现散光(巩膜伤口缝合关闭:61%;无缝合技术:52%)。