Franzeck U K, Schalch I, Seiler Y, Schneider E, Bollinger A
Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Microvasc Res. 1995 Jul;50(1):18-24. doi: 10.1006/mvre.1995.1034.
The purpose of the study was to compare the in vivo effects of two low-osmolar radiographic contrast media, a monoionic (sodium/-meglumine ioxaglate, Hexabrix) and a non-ionic one (iopromide, Ultravist 300) on the cutaneous microcirculation in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease in a prospective randomised double-blind study. In 20 patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease scheduled for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty skin microcirculation was assessed by laser Doppler fluxmetry and transcutaneous oxygen tension measurements at the foot dorsum for continuous recordings of the cutaneous microvascular perfusion and skin oxygenation. Before angioplasty 10 ml nondiluted contrast medium was injected intraarterially and the acute effect on transcutaneous oxygen tension and laser Doppler flux was registered. Mean laser Doppler flux and oxygen tension were evaluated initially, after arterial puncture and after contrast medium injection. In addition, flux motion was analysed with respect to frequency and amplitudes changes. No significant changes in laser Doppler flux and fluxmotion patterns were found between both groups after contrast medium injection. However, mean transcutaneous oxygen tension of the patients receiving monoionic ioxaglate dropped significantly (P = 0.01). The differences of both contrast media on red blood cell aggregation shown in vitro do not correlate to intravital microcirculatory measurements in patients with arterial occlusive disease of the lower limb. Microvascular skin blood flow and flux motion at the foot in these patients do not change significantly after intraarterial injection of ioxaglate and iopromide. However, oxygen supply of the skin is transient impaired after interarterial injection of the anionic contrast agent ioxaglate, which was not associated with clinical symptoms.
本研究的目的是在一项前瞻性随机双盲研究中,比较两种低渗放射造影剂对周围动脉闭塞性疾病患者皮肤微循环的体内作用,这两种造影剂分别为单离子型(碘克沙醇钠/葡甲胺,Hexabrix)和非离子型(碘普罗胺,优维显300)。在20例计划接受经皮腔内血管成形术的周围动脉闭塞性疾病患者中,通过激光多普勒血流仪和经皮氧分压测量来评估足背皮肤微循环,以连续记录皮肤微血管灌注和皮肤氧合情况。在血管成形术前,经动脉注射10 ml未稀释的造影剂,并记录其对经皮氧分压和激光多普勒血流的急性影响。分别在动脉穿刺后、造影剂注射后,最初评估平均激光多普勒血流和氧分压。此外,还分析了血流运动的频率和幅度变化。造影剂注射后,两组之间的激光多普勒血流和血流运动模式均未发现显著变化。然而,接受单离子型碘克沙醇的患者平均经皮氧分压显著下降(P = 0.01)。两种造影剂在体外显示的对红细胞聚集的差异与下肢动脉闭塞性疾病患者的活体微循环测量结果不相关。在这些患者中,经动脉注射碘克沙醇和碘普罗胺后,足部的微血管皮肤血流和血流运动没有显著变化。然而,动脉内注射阴离子造影剂碘克沙醇后,皮肤的氧供应会短暂受损,但这与临床症状无关。