Suppr超能文献

去铁胺、地拉罗司及其他铁和铝螯合药物的疗效与毒性比较

Comparative efficacy and toxicity of desferrioxamine, deferiprone and other iron and aluminium chelating drugs.

作者信息

Kontoghiorghes G J

机构信息

Department of Haematology, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, University of London, UK.

出版信息

Toxicol Lett. 1995 Oct;80(1-3):1-18. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03415-h.

Abstract

The efficacy and toxicity aspects of the iron and aluminium chelating drugs desferrioxamine and deferiprone (L1, 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one), have been compared. Major emphasis was given in the use of these two and also of other chelators in conditions of iron overload, imbalance and toxicity, as well as the incidence and possible causes of toxic side effects in both animals and humans. The chemical basis of chelation and the interaction of these chelators with the iron pools are discussed within the context of clinical application in iron overload and other conditions such as renal dialysis, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, heart disease, malaria, etc. The design and development of new orally active alpha-ketohydroxypyridine and other chelators are considered and compared with 14 other chelators which have been previously tested in man for the removal of iron, most of which, however, were later abandoned because of low efficacy or major toxicity. The design of new therapeutic protocols based on the pharmacological, toxicological and metabolic transformation properties of the chelating drugs is also being considered, within the context of maximising their efficacy and minimising their toxicity. Overall, oral deferiprone appears to be as effective as s.c. desferrioxamine in the removal of iron and aluminium in man and to have a similar but different toxicity profile from desferrioxamine in both animals and man. The low cost and oral activity of deferiprone will make it the drug of choice for the vast majority of patients, who are not currently being chelated either because they cannot afford the high cost of desferrioxamine therapy or are not complying or have toxic side effects with its s.c. administration.

摘要

对铁和铝螯合药物去铁胺和去铁酮(L1,1,2 - 二甲基 - 3 - 羟基吡啶 - 4 - 酮)的疗效和毒性方面进行了比较。重点关注了这两种螯合剂以及其他螯合剂在铁过载、失衡和毒性情况下的应用,以及动物和人类中毒性副作用的发生率和可能原因。在铁过载及其他病症(如肾透析、类风湿性关节炎、癌症、心脏病、疟疾等)的临床应用背景下,讨论了螯合的化学基础以及这些螯合剂与铁池的相互作用。考虑了新型口服活性α - 酮羟基吡啶及其他螯合剂的设计与开发,并与之前在人体中进行过铁清除测试的其他14种螯合剂进行了比较,然而,其中大多数后来因疗效低或毒性大而被放弃。还在考虑基于螯合药物的药理、毒理和代谢转化特性设计新的治疗方案,以最大限度地提高其疗效并最小化其毒性。总体而言,口服去铁酮在人体中铁和铝的清除方面似乎与皮下注射去铁胺一样有效,并且在动物和人体中具有与去铁胺相似但不同的毒性特征。去铁酮的低成本和口服活性将使其成为绝大多数患者的首选药物,这些患者目前未接受螯合治疗,原因要么是他们负担不起去铁胺治疗的高昂费用,要么是不依从治疗,要么是皮下注射去铁胺有中毒性副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验