del Hoyo Campos J, Burgos Revilla F J, Lovaco Castellano F, Fernández Fernández E, Galmes Belmonte I, Borrego Hernando J, Rodríguez Luna J M
Servicio de Urología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España.
Arch Esp Urol. 1995 Sep;48(7):735-40.
Ureterointestinal stricture represents a serious problem whose management has traditionally been by open surgery. Endourological treatment is an alternative that is generally free from the complications of open surgery, but with a lower success rate. The efficacy of endourological treatment is analyzed in 14 cases of ureteroileal stricture (12 patients) and the different treatment options are discussed.
Ureteroileal stricture was managed endourologically in 9 of 13 cases (69%) by dilatation (6 cases), incision+dilatation (2 cases) and stenting (1 case).
Of the 6 cases submitted to dilatation, 3 recurred at 6 months, 2 remained patent at 18 and 24 months, respectively, and 1 was lost to follow up because the patient underwent reimplantation (40% success rate). The two cases submitted to incision are patent at 18 and 19 months, respectively.
The overall success rate for endourological treatment of ureteroileal stricture is 28% (4/14 cases) at 19 months mean follow up.
