• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同剂量静脉注射依那普利拉治疗高血压急症患者的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of different doses of intravenous enalaprilat in patients with hypertensive crises.

作者信息

Hirschl M M, Binder M, Bur A, Herkner H, Brunner M, Müllner M, Sterz F, Laggner A N

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1995 Nov 13;155(20):2217-23.

PMID:7487244
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The appropriate dose of intravenous enalaprilat to be used in the treatment of hypertensive crisis is controversial. There has been no comparative study of the efficacy and safety of different dosages of enalaprilat in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

Sixty-five consecutive patients with hypertensive urgencies (systolic blood pressure > 210 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 110 mm Hg) or emergencies (diastolic blood pressure > 100 mm Hg and evidence of end-organ damage, ie, angina pectoris, hypertensive encephalopathy, or congestive heart failure) admitted to an emergency department from January 1, 1994, to September 30, 1994, were identified. The patients were randomized to receive different doses of enalaprilat (0.625, 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg). Response to treatment was defined as a stable reduction of systolic blood pressure to below 180 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure to below 95 mm Hg within 45 minutes after the start of treatment and relief of symptoms in patients with hypertensive emergencies.

RESULTS

In 41 (63%) of 65 patients, the treatment goal was reached. Twenty-four patients (37%) failed to achieve the goal of treatment within 45 minutes after administration of enalaprilat. The response rates in the 0.625-mg, 1.25-mg, 2.5-mg, and 5-mg groups were 67%, 65%, 59%, and 62%, respectively. The proportion of patients initially randomized who responded to treatment was not different between any of the four groups of enalaprilat doses. There were no significant differences according to enalaprilat dose with respect to changes in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure. No severe side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Enalaprilat is a safe antihypertensive drug with moderate efficacy in the treatment of hypertensive crisis. As doses above 0.625 mg alter neither response rates nor the magnitude of blood pressure reduction, we recommend 0.625 mg as the initial dose in the treatment of hypertensive crisis.

摘要

背景

用于治疗高血压急症的静脉注射依那普利拉的合适剂量存在争议。目前尚无关于不同剂量依那普利拉在高血压患者中的疗效和安全性的比较研究。

方法

确定了1994年1月1日至1994年9月30日期间连续收治入急诊科的65例高血压急症(收缩压>210 mmHg和/或舒张压>110 mmHg)或高血压亚急症(舒张压>100 mmHg且有靶器官损害证据,即心绞痛、高血压脑病或充血性心力衰竭)患者。患者被随机分配接受不同剂量的依那普利拉(0.625、1.25、2.5和5 mg)。治疗反应定义为治疗开始后45分钟内收缩压稳定降至180 mmHg以下且舒张压降至95 mmHg以下,以及高血压亚急症患者症状缓解。

结果

65例患者中有41例(63%)达到治疗目标。24例患者(37%)在给予依那普利拉后45分钟内未达到治疗目标。0.625 mg、1.25 mg、2.5 mg和5 mg组的反应率分别为67%、65%、59%和62%。四组依那普利拉剂量中,最初随机分组的患者中对治疗有反应的比例在任何一组之间均无差异。依那普利拉剂量在收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压变化方面无显著差异。未观察到严重副作用。

结论

依那普利拉是一种安全的抗高血压药物,在治疗高血压急症方面疗效中等。由于0.625 mg以上的剂量既不改变反应率也不改变血压降低幅度,我们建议将0.625 mg作为治疗高血压急症的初始剂量。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of different doses of intravenous enalaprilat in patients with hypertensive crises.不同剂量静脉注射依那普利拉治疗高血压急症患者的临床评估
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Nov 13;155(20):2217-23.
2
Efficacy of different antihypertensive drugs in the emergency department.不同降压药物在急诊科的疗效
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Sep;10 Suppl 3:S143-6.
3
[Arterial hypertension difficult to control in the elderly patient. The significance of the "white coat effect"].老年患者中难以控制的动脉高血压。“白大衣效应”的意义
Rev Port Cardiol. 1999 Oct;18(10):897-906.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
5
[Intravenous urapidil versus sublingual nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies].静脉注射乌拉地尔与舌下含服硝苯地平治疗高血压急症的比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1994 Jul-Aug;42(7-8):365-71.
6
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.动态血压与诊室血压用于评估临床试验中抗高血压疗效:来自Val-Syst研究的见解
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003.
7
Evaluation of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of intravenous enalaprilat in the treatment of grade III essential hypertension in Indian patients.评估静脉注射依那普利拉治疗印度患者Ⅲ级原发性高血压的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
Indian Heart J. 2004 Jan-Feb;56(1):67-9.
8
The diagnosis and treatment of hypertensive crises.高血压急症的诊断与治疗
Postgrad Med. 2009 Jan;121(1):5-13. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.01.1950.
9
[Hypertensive crises. 2. Treatment].[高血压危象。2. 治疗]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1995 Dec 18;157(51):7140-5.
10
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood Pressure Reduction in Hypertensive Acute Heart Failure.高血压性急性心力衰竭的血压降低。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2021 Feb 20;23(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11906-021-01127-8.
2
Management of hypertensive crises in the elderly.老年人高血压急症的管理
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Jul;15(7):504-512. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.07.007.
3
Optimizing Hypertensive Acute Heart Failure Management with Afterload Reduction.优化降压治疗以改善急性心力衰竭患者的预后
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018 Feb 24;20(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s11906-018-0809-7.
4
Intravenous enalaprilat for treatment of acute hypertensive heart failure in the emergency department.静脉注射依那普利拉用于急诊科急性高血压性心力衰竭的治疗。
Int J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;9(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12245-016-0125-4. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
5
Therapies to Reduce Blood Pressure Acutely.急性降压疗法。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016 Jun;18(6):43. doi: 10.1007/s11906-016-0651-8.
6
Lack of evidence for intravenous vasodilators in ED patients with acute heart failure: a systematic review.急诊急性心力衰竭患者应用静脉血管扩张剂缺乏证据:一项系统评价
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;33(2):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
7
Control of hypertension in the critically ill: a pathophysiological approach.危重病患者的高血压控制:病理生理学方法。
Ann Intensive Care. 2013 Jun 27;3(1):17. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-17.
8
Perioperative hypertension management.围手术期高血压管理
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(3):615-27. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s2471.
9
Characteristics and management of patients presenting to the emergency department with hypertensive urgency.因高血压急症就诊于急诊科的患者的特征与管理
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Jan;8(1):12-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2005.04898.x.
10
Comparative tolerability profile of hypertensive crisis treatments.高血压危象治疗的耐受性比较概况
Drug Saf. 1998 Aug;19(2):99-122. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199819020-00003.